Posted on 08/15/2021 10:37:42 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
Did the materials released by Mike Lindell at his Cyber Symposium meet evidentiary standards of relevance, proof of origin, chain-of-secure-custody and reproducibility that online security experts say would be needed to take seriously his claim that he holds massive data files showing the 2020 election was stolen by hackers? No, that's not true. Lead Stories asked for the information necessary to authenticate his evidence two weeks in advance of the symposium and was rebuffed, and the materials released August 10, 11 and 12, 2021, were more of what Lindell showed before the gathering: videos showing computer code of unauthenticated origin scrolling in a continuous loop.
During the weeks leading up to the Cyber Symposium, Lead Stories staff talked to Lindell, his anonymous designated spokesperson and national election security and cybersecurity experts to double-check what would be needed to verify that Lindell has what he claims he has. We boiled it down to nine questions.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at leadstories.com ...
You are on a wild goose chase. Police don’t need an arrest warrant to make arrests for what they are claiming was the basis.
Love how you can ascertain all that from one question and one statement.
You must be taking lessons from the LSM in ciphering what a person REALLY means to say instead of understanding what was said. CNN would be happy to hire you.
That was troubling. 0 voting machines. 1 standard office scanner.
My guess we will see whether he was playing poker or has the goods as the Dominion case moves forward and evidence is submitted.
Yes all of the battleground states stopped reporting returns. I’m not sure what you are getting at. Literally millions of people saw exactly what I said. Around 10pm Trump had an insurmountable lead in the battleground states and the election was effectively over and Trump had won, then Foxnews (Traitors) and all the media stopped reporting returns. The dems on the ground kicked out all observers then spent the rest of the night manufacturing hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes to put biden ahead. This is irrefutable. Trump won and biden/harris are illegitimate.
I didn’t see any of them complaining whatsoever.
I doubt you looked. As I said, discovery in the legal process will expose much. When that happens, let’s circle back. I’ll eat my crow if wrong. How about you?
Mike Lindell is a brave & honest person who has spent millions of his own money to try & save this nation from the clutches of communism, and all you can do is denigrate & disparage him to try and paint him as nothing more than a huckster. I've had enough from all you nattering nabobs of negativism. I knew from the moment he began announcing his symposium, that there would be multiple attempts to disrupt it coupled with attempts to discredit his evidence.
Thus, his being warned that a trap had been set if he released his data, may have been a legitimate warning, or perhaps even a last ditch effort to prevent him from releasing it. Mission accomplished. Now you deep-state operatives, or even their useful idiots can go to work with their efforts to try to completely destroy him. I for one, will not be influenced by you dirty tricksters.
For, even as a citizen of this country, I was convinced by remarks leading up to the election, as proof, that they had something up their sleeve.
Such as; Nancy Pelosi's remark just days before the election: “I feel very confident that Joe Biden will be elected president on Tuesday, whatever the end count is on the election that occurs on Tuesday. He will be elected, on January 20 he will be inaugurated president.”
Couple that with Biden's remarks, again just before the election: “Folks, we got a lot of work to do,” he yelled. “I don’t need you to get me elected, I need you once I’m elected.”
Previously, Biden had stated: "We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics," Biden said in the video.
Those alone should be enough prima facie evidence to have conducted a thorough review of the election, even without all of the anomalies that were witnessed on election night. Never before had a state stopped counting votes, yet there were 5 states that suspended their state's vote counting process. There were literally thousands of people who submitted depositions of voter fraud, none were even entertained within the legal system at all.
What are you constructively doing to try and save this nation?. Apparently nothing, since you seem to have chosen to carry the water for the enemies of this nation, to the point that I am now beginning to question if you are some kind of deep-state plant who inserted himself into this board many years ago now. I certainly hope that is not the case, but if it is, may God have mercy upon your soul.
See, you have conclusions, of which, none are based upon facts, bat rather your beliefs. That statement above proves my point. I assume your statement to mean I never even looked at the symposium, but I not only looked at it live, I taped it so I could review it to as there was a lot of information supplied. In fact, too much for me to possibly retain all of it with any degree of accuracy.
No, I won't eat crow, for it just means that you nattering nabobs of negativism who are now supplying aid & comfort to the forces of evil were very effective, but not with me and never will be. Nor am I interested in seeing you eat crow either, for I am not at war with you. I personally could care less what you think or believe, to be brutally honest.
My guess is you will never find truth, for you are apparently incapable of seeing the truth. When presented with it, you want to ignore it and question it because you were not left without a single doubt. While when I viewed the same information I saw lots to be gleaned from it and it only enhanced my solid belief this election was stolen. That it was stolen for evil purposes. Because I have eyes that saw all the anomalies that transpired during this presidential election cycle.
What may have been promised, but fell short of the mark in delivery, does not concern me. Why you ask? Because I knew that this symposium would be attacked, so as to prevent them from actually delivering all that they have. For the truth must not come out, otherwise, lots of guilty participants would go either to prison or face firing squads for their acts of treason. In other words, I saw this coming. I am thankful that their trap was cut in the bud before it had time to bloom, and that the evidence was not seized and lost forever.
So, if you believe this was an honest & fair election, then by all means run with what you believe to be the truth.
I know the truth, that Biden did not win this election honestly. I never considered that proving it would be easy, even if the smoking gun were present, because most people would not understand the evidence presented. So, I took Mike Lindell's bravado with a grain of salt to begin with. Not because I don't believe him, but because I know that he is passionate in this cause. Yet, I also knew that the vast majority would not understand the evidence directly, and that the evidence would have to be interpreted for them. That alone would not convince people who don't want to believe in the first place.
This is why it is very hard to convince people, even when presented with evidence that is true and factual. Because it cannot be proven when machines are involved to most lay people. Machines that most think they know, but the vast majority who really don't know how they even work.
So If the election was theoretically stolen in the same way for the benefit of Trump, displayed at the symposium with the same evidence to show it was stolen from Biden, would you be saying the election really belonged to Biden?
You see, my trust is not with the symposium, it is with Mike Lindell.
Thanks for the reply.
Dr. David Clements LIVE! Bad Actors EXPOSED, Coup Attempt REAL, All Lies REVEALED!
Thanks. I will. Do you know Lindell personally?
I am encouraged that you have agreed to watch it.
Here is the blurb that is at the video site:
Dr. David Clements is a law professor at New Mexico State University.
Clements was a long-time Deputy District Attorney that oversaw six law enforcement agencies and prosecuted thousands of cases.
Clements rose to national prominence after standing up to his university's mistreatment of conservative students and faculty.
In the past two weeks, Clements has spent personal time with Mike Lindell, Lin Wood, General Michael Flynn and President Donald Trump.
Dr. Clements joined Stew Peters for an extremely candid conversation on 'The Stew Peters Show
He also is a calm voice rather than Lindellesque. That in my book gives him more credence. I also realize that this format didn’t give him time to do that, but it would have been a good place to have a web site to supplement and clarify those concerns. I am a bit perplexed why he didn’t offer more detail on what Lin Wood, General Flynn and others are discussing and why it’s important. I do plan to reach out to him and ask.
He was referring to Josh Merritt who was part of the red team at the symposium.
I figured. But why not call him out? Does Merritt get the 5 mil?
No, he did nothing more than make a statement. He provided no proof. Since it came out (was reported on) during the symposium, I can only guess that in that interview he didn’t think it necessary to mention his name directly. But that is pure speculation on my part, since I can’t discern his reason for not doing so.
“Lindell being the most gullible of all, I think.”
I 100 percent support what he’s trying to do, but I agree that he’s gullible. That was glaring every time he said that SCOTUS would overturn the election “9 to 0”. He doesn’t get that SCOTUS has sold out. Naive? Innocent?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.