Secondly, Lindell through his lawyer, did not confirm, and appears to deny that Elizabeth Montgomery, or anyone else sharing her surname, is the source of the massive data file at issue. The lawyer stated the the data comes from multiple sources, not just one guy. So all of the trolls spreading the disinformation that one shady guy invented 37 TB of data and is conning us all got it wrong. Again, Lindell didn't promise to reveal his sources. He simply invited IT experts to examine the files and offered a reward if they could prove it fake. So far, no participant at the event has stated anything was fake.
For those who want to know the rest of the story, write your Congressman and Senators to demand an investigation. Congress has the power to subpoena witnesses and documents, not Mike Lindell. Lindell is a salesman, not a lawyer. Obviously, the purpose of the symposium was to build momentum for audits, which might lead to decertification of the election, not to give away his sources, or to put witnesses or their families in danger for no reason, i.e., without the ability to effect a remedy. We pary that is upcoming, the Good Lord willing.
“Again, Lindell didn’t promise to reveal his sources. He simply invited IT experts to examine the files and offered a reward if they could prove it fake. So far, no participant at the event has stated anything was fake.”
You don’t offer $5mm in a situation like this without knowing the outcome in advance. When I how Lindell worded the challenge I knew he knew the outcome.
And right on queue the corrupt Biden regime has shut down https://lindelltv.com
The Washington Times over recent years has been slowly devolving from a conservative paper to an increasingly liberal slant. Looks like they are following the Fox News business plan.
They have reporters who are definitely not Trump fans, and an increasing number of commentary writers who spout the establishment Republican garbage, with a heavy anti-Trump tilt.
The paper used to provide a balance to the communist Washington Post. Now it looks like all their reporters are auditioning for a job at the Post.
This clarification is somewhat reassuring. The original WT hit piece seemed to suggest that the PCAP data was “not recoverable” meaning the hex data was encrypted in a way that would not allow viewing of the traces. This update indicates the data was “unreliable” which just means that Merritt was able to read and interpret the traces (not encrypted) but that he could not personally draw conclusions about its authenticity or origin.
This is not uncommon with packet sniffing investigations that are not done on the individual’s own profile of the sniffer. They can’t find what they need to see using an unfamiliar tool and would need more time than they were given to form solid opinions.
Without internet access to whois or similar search engines they couldn’t confirm the IP registrations of addresses referenced in the PCAP for example.
Too bad the data snippet was intentionally poisoned by one of the CISSP credentialed attendees so they couldn’t be distributed and give people more time on their own stack. I guess the term “ethical hacker” depends on who signs your paycheck these days.
:: One guy who may not presently agree that China hacked the election, doesn’t undermine the purpose of the meeting.::
~~~~~~~~
Doesn’t matter. These “journalists” are not interested in the truth. They are simply seeking two distract attention from the real story, which is that the election was stolen.
Yep, the snickering-idiot posters on this site — the rabid anti-Lindell haters — were having orgasms over that false story.
“He simply invited IT experts to examine the files and offered a reward if they could prove it fake. So far, no participant at the event has stated anything was fake.”
So far, no participant at the event seems to have been allowed to actually examine the files.
Just so we're clear. There's more distance between Fusion GPS and the Clinton campaign than Mike Lindell and Joss Merritt. ;-)
Isn’t Merritt’s statement just a “look squirrel” distraction? Seems to me that Merritt’s comment meant little, and has been magnified far out of proportion.
Let’s posit that Mr. Lindell’s 37 TB of data is chock full of real evidence of massive and strategic digital intrusions into US election systems, including foreign transmissions from China and other places, timing that exactly matches changes in US election tallies, etc.
Would all that necessarily prove with total certainty that CHINA was the actor behind it all? Can we disprove the possibility that the US Intel/CIA, Russian Intel, Soros, or others unknown, did the job and left trails to implicate others? Merritt is not in a position to know it was “China” (and what is meant by “China”? CCP? PRC government? PLA? Hunter Biden’s Business Partners?).
Step One: Does Lindell (or anyone else) have proof that votes were changed or election data and results manipulated in the US 2020 election via digital connections by non-official operators. If so, explain the facts so we can understand them.
Step Two: Who dun it. Leave that until Step One is in the bank.
Rightwing Conspiratr1 is trashing Lindell left & right, a solid conservative who is fighting the fight.
The Washington Times is the Conservative paper in Washington DC, not a random website.
Here’s a pretty interesting interview with Wiebe talking about Montegomery, along with election fraud more generally:
https://banned.video/watch?id=611f96b563db74600b02c158
Wiebe still very sharp, if you listen all the way through.