Hussein agrees.
> current climate models exaggerate greenhouse warming.
Whaaaaaat? Shocking! No one even suspected it... except for every rational person that sees yet another doomsday pass every few years.
Hussein agrees.
All those same events have occurred millions of times over the course of years.
Climate is what it is. Man is miniscule when added to the picture.
And at the same time, man has been creative in making a world to support the masses. Some regions have done better..some have done worse...but our work continues.
75% of the current 415 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere comes from nature......
expect climate lockdowns nonetheless:
11 Aug: Bitchute: 11m: Computing Forever: LOCKDOWN SEASON: CLIMATE CHANGE, AUSTRALIA AND HOPE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/11dyu3v4uIfE/
Take a good look at this graph.
Notice the left hand side- the temperature scale is +/- ONE DEGREE Celsius.
Think about that- ONE DEGREE. Do you think they are able to accurately show the global temperature hundreds of years ago (thousands, actually) to WITHIN A FRACTION OF ONE DEGREE?
Based on TREE RINGS?
There is a basic, fundamental, unwavering scientific principle that you cannot predict anything to an accuracy greater than your measuring device.
They think (actually I am pretty sure they are counting on it) that a science-y looking graph with actual numbers and decimal points will make dumb people and liberals (but I repeat myself) go “Hmmm that’s sure scary - let’s throw trillions of dollars at this”
But they can be certain of that result- that every solution to every problem is more government money.
“Could this be a turning point for climate science?”
The author is kidding, right? These scientists will be fired, cancelled, de-platformed, shunned and spit on. Maybe worse...if they visit Marcy Park. They’ll be lucky to get jobs sliding French fries into little cardboard sleeves at the local McDonald’s.
Their lives are over.
Funny how there is no “Policy” step in The Scientific Method.
That glaring step likely confuses eager sociology, civil engineering, business, environmental “science”, and economics students at cushy universities.
The average man on the street, soccer mom or young, sweaty Antifa mob partier or white, spoiled, upscale, female or soy-built progressive suburbanite, BLM, SJW would not ponder this as it generally would provoke troubling headaches.
In fact, as soon as researchers hint at or strongly recommend solutions to societal or individual problems, it ceases- violently, to be Science.
I’m talking to you Fauci. To the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change. To smarmy governors who blurt Just “Following the Science” when faced with obvious evidence of their Totalitarian actions that shock humanity.
Don’t let anyone in speech, writing or media get away with one of the Biggest Lies of the last century. Science requires - relentless - skepticism or it can’t work and we end up with woeful decisions like
- forcing active Covid patients into Senior Care facilities while Quarantining the healthy and productive.
- abandoning all reason in transforming elections into sporting events controlled by wealthy, psychotic, zealots who use pandemics as excuses for well known, worst practices in voting.
- abandoning real, hard, biologically based scientific understanding to force tragic, sexually deviant fantasies into mainstream dogma and into our children’s souls.
- Critical Race Theory, another militant, hateful, and racist ideology targeting society as a whole to tear down the most successful nations in history and keep minorities on their sociopolitical plantations while generating billions for their masters.
The list is endless. Eggs will kill you. Trans fats like margarine are smart and healthy. Carbon dioxide - which feeds all plant life and hence all life, is a dangerous pollution.
Small towns with traditional values are toxic legacies of ignorant, obsolete ages but jamming poor, desparate populations into cement, steel, neon, and glass cages where family’s are dissolved and diseases and crime are rampant are saluted as Smart Cities.
Personal transportation is no longer needed as is the freedom of choice as to when, how and to where travel is permitted. Religion is ignorance while soul-destroying perversion is tolerated and celebrated. The internet as it exists today.
All of these evils can be founded on the literally ignorant and arrogant policies of champions of a “science” where attacking a flawed hypothesis or challenging dodgy, incomplete, illogical, or nonexistent experimental results is banned from social media, any media eventually and banned from thought when possible.
Is Scientific method perfect? No, but it’s just logic and not accepting positions unless they cannot be shown false after continuous, intense and creative scrutiny and may still be overturned in future inquiries.
Maybe the standard Scientific Method approach could add a final step after sharing results (Wuhan, CDC/WHO) - to determine Cui Bono, who benefits, or maybe more simply “Follow the Money” regarding potential policies derived from actual Science, properly performed.
All of the models, way back to global cooling predictions of decades ago; have been systematically tweaked to fit data. Not confirmed against half the data to prove the formulae, and then tested against the other half to prove. No, all data is consumed (or ignored) and then the model is still tweaked to continually fit new measurements.
This is corrupt science. None of these people belong in any org doing research on anything.
I’ve done research. If I tried any of this I’d have been thrown out.
Doesn’t matter the Democrats will drown them in money anyway
Consider that CO2 in our atmosphere is a TRACE gas at roughly 600 parts per million. I find difficult to believe that our entire planet’s climate hinges on parts per million changes in a single trace gas. Certainly there are other factors influencing our climate most notably the varying output of the sun, deep ocean currents and even the wobble in the tilt of the earth’s axis that gives us seasonal temperature changes. However to the climate alarmists these factors are outweighed by part per million changes in a single trace gas. It is worth noting that this greenhouse gas theory cannot explain why in relatively recent geological times the northern hemisphere was covered with glaciers a mile thick and that subsequent warming melted these glaciers.