Call me skeptical, but isn’t it in the best financial interests of the vaccine manufacturers to continue to administer boosters? They have a terrified and compliant populace at hand.
It’d explain why we’re seeing such a spike too.
4 months immunity is practically worthless.
At this point the best treatment is to get the shot - get immunity - then get the real thing so your immune system can train against the real thing after the practice test.
hooked for life
and literally, with the spike proteins
Israel also dropped Pfizer going forward and will only use Moderna.
Follow the money...every time.
Americans mask:
why did the CEO not take it HIMSELF?
why did they HIDE the antiplacental effects?
why was it inserted?
who did it?
Very easy way for Pfizer to make massive illegitimate profits off a very dodgy vaccine that does not work and has not even been approved by the FDA.
Turning the World into Vaccine Dependent Zombies
“Pfizer says immunity can drop to 83% within four months in people who got its COVID-19 shot, further bolstering the company case for a booster”
that’s a feature, not a bug ...
so the vaccines don’t protect society as a whole because the vaccinated are not protected from being infected and communicating their infection to others, plus the little bit of personal protection is wearing off after 16 weeks, so now
everyone is going to forced to get a “booster” twice a year?
are you shitting me?
Pfizer says, “BUY OUR PRODUCT! WE GET RICH!”
Sort of like only selling light bulbs that quickly burn out.
“Oh, darn! I guess you need to buy a 13th light bulb.
Well, lucky you, I just happened to have some right here!”
Well, if you need a shot of Pfizer every 4 months, sounds like the stock might be a “buy”
Or else time to switch to something more effective.
Power and the money
Money and the power
Minute by the minute
Hour by the hour
My opinion: They should have got the science “right” before putting such a product on the market.
Nothing like being the test group for an unproven product, I guess.
Booster, booster, booster!
Gee, you’d think it was DESIGNED that way to get repeat business!
Just like the virus itself was designed …
… or at least bred, to be more infectious by gain of function research which Congress tried to stop funding but Dr Faulty and his cohorts illegally returned funding to.
As I understand it, they are talking about effectiveness or efficacy, defined as the reduction (compared to the unvaccinated) in bad outcomes (ending up in an ICU or dead). I don’t think they are talking about avoiding being infected. That distinction is important because there have to be tens of millions of Covid Karens who will go into full-fledged apoplexy when they test positive (even if there is very little ill effect on them).
-bookmark-
“Pfizer says immunity can drop to 83% within four months in people who got its COVID-19 shot, further bolstering the company case for a booster”
—
I don’t remember this being mentioned when the vaccines were rolled out. Oh, that’s right, there was no long term testing.