Posted on 08/08/2021 9:45:54 AM PDT by ransomnote
The Pfizer coronavirus vaccine may be linked to a form of severe eye inflammation called uveitis which can lead to permanent loss of vision, according to a multicenter Israeli study led by Prof. Zohar Habot-Wilner from Tel Aviv’s Sourasky Medical Center.
The research was conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus, Galilee Medical Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, Kaplan Medical Center and Sourasky.
It was accepted for publication by the peer-reviewed ophthalmology journal Retina.
Habot-Wilner, head of the Uveitis Service at the hospital, found that 21 people (23 eyes) who had received two shots of the Pfizer vaccine developed uveitis within one to 14 days after receiving their first shot or within one day to one month after the second, reported the Jerusalem Post.
Twenty-one people developed anterior uveitis, and two developed Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome (MEWDS).
“All the patients in the study met the World Health Organization and Naranjo criteria linking the onset of uveitis to the vaccination,” Habot-Wilner said.
“This time frame is consistent with other reports of uveitis following various vaccines.”
She said that any patients that had other systemic diseases that could have been related to uveitis were under control before vaccination.
MORE AT LINK
Hi.
I’ll tell you what the Rona has caused.
Medical fear porn. Exacerbated by the corrupt corporate media and CDC (along with others).
Old Xi and the CCP got us (and the world) bad. China owes big time.
Remedies? Cancel $1T in T-bills, and nuke Wuhan?
5.56mm
Nope. Weiss ring.
SafeAndEffective
————
Sure, with NO side effect studies ever done. #Failed Vaccines- and they continue…..
Exactly
But.......
The 31 yo daughter of a friend has this. Took the pfizer vaxes. super sad.
Then, having an eye doctor zap the floaters with a laser, probably will not work for you.
almost 5-6 billion ‘eyes’ have had the shot, 23 possible eye conditions which *may* possibly be related to the shot, all of which have since recovered...wow, sounds like time to panic.
However, as per a RN friend, this still may be of interest to you.
https://www.reviewofoptometry.com/article/sinking-the-floaters
Based on VAERS numbers, the vaccines are 99.998% risk free.
That is better odds of success by orders of magnitude than an elective surgery for a nose job.
What about the fact that less than 1% of adverse effects are in VAERS?
What about the evidence the CDC is withholding VAERS reports from publication?
What about the fact that the CDC created V-Safe to hide reports from VAERS. ALl vaccinated are invited to register for free, convenient phone app which will store their adverse event reports on a private database only the CDC can access?
You people always act like VAERS has 100% of the adverse events when it obviously doesn’t.
What about the lawsuit filed in LA in which a federal employee saw 45K deaths following ‘vaccination’ sitting unreported to VAERS in the CMS database, one of eleven databases that feed vaers?
What part of watching seizures for unnecsary ‘vaccines’ got ‘old’ for you?
The ‘vaccines’ are bioweapons and they are not risk free by any distorted stretch of the fetid imagination.
1000 COVID Stories – Share Your Story
It's indecent to interview Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci as if they are reputable and worth hearing. Infuriating to watch MSM anchors lick the boots of mass murders.
Her hands started shaking that morning until it spread all over her body

6vRGVvO.gif (162×260) (imgur.com)
In the clip below, she says she's taking deep breaths, and "This is not a panic attack". At the end of the video she turns to the camera and says, "We need help."

https://i.imgur.com/zSIeDbD.gif
This video begins with a child having a seizure. I'll allow others to make the choice to view it.
https://i.imgur.com/hLgoAeX.gif
Then video of the child's siezure cuts to a reporter asking if the 'vaccines' are safe given 80% of trial participants had system adverse events (e.g., chills etc.) and Bill Gates responds saying it's not severe in that the effects were not permanent. Then the video of the boy seizing resumes.
I am not here to INVESTGATE how scrupulous VAERS is. I simply do not have time or resources to do that.
VAERS is as good a source of Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System, as any. I simply take their numbers, divide by the number of Americans vaccinated at the same time frame, and multiply that fraction by 100 to arrive at risk percentage.
My last calculation showed 0.002% risk.
Which is same as saying 99.998% safe.
VAERS is as good a source of Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System, as any. I simply take their numbers, divide by the number of Americans vaccinated at the same time frame, and multiply that fraction by 100 to arrive at risk percentage.
My last calculation showed 0.002% risk.
Which is same as saying 99.998% safe.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
YOu are here to distort the only source of scraps of evidence the public can lay hands on by falsely stating that the fragment of information in Vaers shows these toxic bioweapons only have a .002% risk. THIS is how you spend the days the US is under biowarfare attack - by encouraging people to go get it because it's supposedly very safe.
Why not look at 100 or 200 deaths per 500,000 vaccines per year for 30 years and compare it to 12,000+ deaths in 8 months for under 300 thousand vaccines, eh?
Deaths reported after Covid 'vaccinations' in the past 8 months account for 58% of all deaths published to VAERS in the 30 year history of the database. Doesn't that seem like it could be concern?
Of the 1,357,036 reports of adverse events currently published to VAERs, 40% (545,337) are for Covid 'vaccines.' Does that seem right to you? Less than one year of 'vaccination' accounts for 40% of all adverse events reported in the last 30 years?
Yeah, maybe not wow for you but having had this condition off and on for years, it is wow for those who get it. Surely, with the entire medical profession onboard the vaccine express, only a tiny fraction of adverse events are being reported. Apart from children and the feeble-minded, we are all responsible for our own decisions. The warning signs were there for all to see.
...primary care providers, the people who know their patients best, aren’t allowed to offer the vaccines
_________________
Doesn’t matter, IMO. People with psoriasis are told it is not an autoimmune condition. Cardiac recuperatives, people on chemo for Crohn’s (autoimmune), rheumatoid arthritis (autoimmune), those with venous insufficiency are all told by the majority of PCPs to *take the shot*.
Many clinicians are happy to run thousands of dollars worth of tests post-inoculation, report all findings as *normal* and will rarely make a connection between the inoculation and the *events*.
Why are even the apologists so sanguine about that?
The level of ad hominem in the apologists’ posts is astonishing to me.
What is their skin in the game?
frm the JP: Doses of Pfitzer administered: 6 million; cases: 21
8 patients had a prior history, only 3 cases were severe and all uveitis cases resolved with corticosteriod drops
from a search: uveitis is a swelling of the colored portion of the eye and more common in females. Fewer than 200,000/yr cases in the US
heartbreaking.
We know. You're here to sell poison to patriots and to make DAMN sure you get to go on your cruises. Cause, after all, what's important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.