I am not here to INVESTGATE how scrupulous VAERS is. I simply do not have time or resources to do that.
VAERS is as good a source of Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System, as any. I simply take their numbers, divide by the number of Americans vaccinated at the same time frame, and multiply that fraction by 100 to arrive at risk percentage.
My last calculation showed 0.002% risk.
Which is same as saying 99.998% safe.
VAERS is as good a source of Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System, as any. I simply take their numbers, divide by the number of Americans vaccinated at the same time frame, and multiply that fraction by 100 to arrive at risk percentage.
My last calculation showed 0.002% risk.
Which is same as saying 99.998% safe.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
YOu are here to distort the only source of scraps of evidence the public can lay hands on by falsely stating that the fragment of information in Vaers shows these toxic bioweapons only have a .002% risk. THIS is how you spend the days the US is under biowarfare attack - by encouraging people to go get it because it's supposedly very safe.
Why not look at 100 or 200 deaths per 500,000 vaccines per year for 30 years and compare it to 12,000+ deaths in 8 months for under 300 thousand vaccines, eh?
Deaths reported after Covid 'vaccinations' in the past 8 months account for 58% of all deaths published to VAERS in the 30 year history of the database. Doesn't that seem like it could be concern?
Of the 1,357,036 reports of adverse events currently published to VAERs, 40% (545,337) are for Covid 'vaccines.' Does that seem right to you? Less than one year of 'vaccination' accounts for 40% of all adverse events reported in the last 30 years?

We know. You're here to sell poison to patriots and to make DAMN sure you get to go on your cruises. Cause, after all, what's important.
