[know.your.why]

a study may say, 23% got better than a placebo but doesn't that mean 77% didn't? or if 70% were better in another study, and 30% didn't, does that put it below vaccine efficacy? ivermectin needs a number

I want to see the study that you're referring to. I'm pretty sure its about as skewed as can be. *Link please*. After you get that link up here, you need to go and look at some REAL WORLD Ivermectin data here:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Take special notice of the bar charts showing the REAL progression of CV19 outbreak and regression after Ivermectin was administered to WHOLE CITIES.

Dont tell me or anyone here that Ivermectin isnt a REAL CURE for Covid19. I take it myself and personally have friends that have and they ALL say it made them completely better in less than 48 hours...usually inside of 24 hours. I take one 10mg dose a month and havent had so much as a sniffle. The real question is WHY isnt it being used by EVERY hospital in the USA? WHY???

[blueplum]

‘the study that you’re referring to.”

Here’s a little chart that sums up metadata results on 61 studies. Ivermecitin 80% range for preventative, in the 60-70% range for early treatment; down to forget it for late treatment with less than 50/50 odds.

https://ivmmeta.com/#:~:text=Evidence%20base%20used%20for%20other%20COVID-19%20approvals%20,%20%2019%2C432%20%20%2070%25%20%5B62%E2%80%9177%25%5D%20

That’s why I’m saying ivermectin needs a number. And a specific dose (since trials doses are all over the place)

It also needs a strong warning that people need pharm invermectin ONLY and not the horse paste that has binding ingredients that mess up the human liver and land people in worse trouble