[blueplum]

‘the study that you’re referring to.”

Here’s a little chart that sums up metadata results on 61 studies. Ivermecitin 80% range for preventative, in the 60-70% range for early treatment; down to forget it for late treatment with less than 50/50 odds.

https://ivmmeta.com/#:~:text=Evidence%20base%20used%20for%20other%20COVID-19%20approvals%20,%20%2019%2C432%20%20%2070%25%20%5B62%E2%80%9177%25%5D%20

That’s why I’m saying ivermectin needs a number. And a specific dose (since trials doses are all over the place)

It also needs a strong warning that people need pharm invermectin ONLY and not the horse paste that has binding ingredients that mess up the human liver and land people in worse trouble

[know.your.why]

Those numbers for Ivermectin are excellent! As for the late treatment...when the patient is so neglected that they are on breathing machines, its too late for any treatment. My point and the Ivermectin study data and field data stand firm. The question remains: Why in Gods holy name isnt Ivermectin made openly available for ALL????