I did! I look more for "/sarc".
"Lies on top of lies around half truths. Is that on purpose?"
Yes, I agree; its all part of deep state/globalism/creeping fabian socialism! (Unintentional rhyme!)
Fascism with a Caduceus:
Posted on 08/03/2021 2:13:22 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Dr. Carrie Madej:
“I have studied the proposed vaccine against Covid-19, and this is my wake-up call to the world. I have looked at the pros and cons, and it scares me, and I want you to know that you have to be very knowledgeable because this new vaccine is not like your normal flu shot. It is something very different. This is something brand new. It's something completely experimental about the human race. And it's not just about being a different vaccine, there are technologies that are introduced with this vaccine that can change our lives very quickly, who we are and what we are. "
(Excerpt) Read more at videos.files.wordpress.com ...
In the following video Hearing Loss After Vax the VAERS entries are broken down by vaccine/manufacturer.
In the UK Yellow Card reporting system adverse outcomes which follow are also reported by vaccine/manufacturer.
It is heartbreaking to see the impact the vaccines are having on hearing health, something of particular interest to me. In addition to hearing loss, both uni- and bilateral, other hearing maladies have been reported. Tinnitus, Menieres and the associated hyperacusis are maddening and can lead to suicide for some. The COVID vaccines are clearly ototoxic.
Did you miss the ending “/S” post. I have had complaints my sarcasm was to subtle.
The vaccines are not workin, have the highest adverse reactions, yet it is our “only hope”. Now it’s just penicillin like in is comparison. NOT. That was a really dumb comparison.
Just for clarity - I just don’t understand why we need to redefine pandemic, vaccine ... for all of this. Nothing makes sense. Lies on top of lies around half truths. Is that on purpose?
Thank you! I’ll give that a look.
“Do you see any disconnect between the headline of this article and a discussion of transhumanism?”
I did not respond to the headline, or the article, I responded to the isolated comment and the comment only, the one I put in quotes. And I have not read many comments on the thread. But if people want to digress, that is their right, and a common part of conservation.
This lady is a medical doctor opining on the dangers of the vaccine. Okay, fair subject that might be interesting. But then she's going off on transhumanism and nanobots. That screams "nutbaggery" right from the jump. Not because discussing transhumanism itself is inherently nuts. That might be an interesting conversation in another context. What makes it nuts is that this doctor is saying that's why she's scared of the vaccine. Nanobota and transhumanism.
Listening to such people is a waste of gray matter.
I did! I look more for "/sarc".
"Lies on top of lies around half truths. Is that on purpose?"
Yes, I agree; its all part of deep state/globalism/creeping fabian socialism! (Unintentional rhyme!)
Fascism with a Caduceus:
When did anybody drop dead or become paralyzed from the neck down from penicillin? Yeh..
“ When did anybody drop dead or become paralyzed from the neck down from penicillin? Yeh..”
*************************************************************
Penicillin and its derivatives are the commonest cause of drug-induced anaphylaxis, accounting for some 500 deaths per year in the United States.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1576461/
There’s more out about this today. I’ll post it a little later.
As opposed to thousands from the covid jab. Pleeze!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.