FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING.[Whistleblower, Dominion Election Management Voting System, 1 min 17 sec video]

youtube.com ^ | August 3, 2021 | Youtube user: William Trippe

[ransomnote]

[H/T Pete from Shawnee Mission]

 

FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING - YouTube 

Aug 3, 2021

[Introductory text posted under the 1:17 minute YOUTUBE video by William Trippe.]

"Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." John 8:32 --

 

A whistleblower reached out with footage filmed of the Dominion Election Management System inside an election center in one of the states that used Dominion software and hardware (not Arizona).

 

As you will see in the video, the whistleblower initially discusses with a Dominion employee about who holds the BIOS password and it is discovered that the STATE is keeping the password - not Dominion, and not the county.

 

Later, the whistleblower asks the Dominion employee about connectivity and whether or not the machines can be connected to the internet...

 

With just 1 minute and 17 seconds, we expose their most egregious lie.

 

FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING.

 

-- disclaimer: This footage was NOT filmed in Arizona. --

 

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe82badf03db... https://anonfiles.com/7aK1l6A5ua/Domi...

 

[Transcript]

[Music]

 

Dominion CEO John Poulos: voting systems are

by design meant to be used as closed

systems that are not networked meaning that they

are not connected to the internet.

 

There is no internet connectivity at all.

They are not designed to be connected to the outside world

through either an internet connection

or any other, uh, external connect

connectivity device.

 

whistleblower: Do we have these passwords in the system?

 

Dominion employee: Not the BIOS passwords.

 

whistleblower: What's that?

 

Dominion employee: The state's keeping them.

 

whistleblower: The state won't let us have our own

passwords?

 

Dominion employee: Not the BIOS passwords.

 

 

Sen. Peter J. Lucido: Does dominion have any way to remotely access any of the information on any of the

equipment or have remote access within the

machines themselves?

 

Dominion CEO John Poulos: No.

 

Sen. Peter J. Lucido: Does anybody have access to the best

of your knowledge?

 

Dominion CEO John Poulos: No.

 

 

Dominion employee: You're connected to the internet.

 

whistleblower: Right.

Dominion employee: This one has wireless.

whistleblower: Right.

 

  

Dominion employee: But the devices are grayed out.

 

whistleblower: Are grayed out. 

 

Dominion employee: Are not checked.

 

whistleblower: Oh. I see.

 

Dominion employee: They are disabled.

 

whistleblower: Okay. So, but you'd be able to go in and do that though right?

 

Dominion employee: Yeah.

 

whistleblower: By unlocking it and putting the password in?

 

Dominion employee: Right.

[FreeReign]

It maybe common sense but find those words in the US Constitution. Those exact words not a penumbra of interpretation implying that ! The Constitution is the supreme law of the land not contract law, not common law. We either accept what it says exactly or we behave like Rats. Who have a “Living Constitution “ that says what they want it to say whenever they need it to say something to fit what they want. One way to remove a sitting President even one elected by fraud. Impeachment by the House followed by conviction in the Senate.

A man steals a gun.

In a court of law, the man is proven to have stolen that gun.

The government takes the gun away from the man.

The man has no Constitutional 2A right not to have that gun seized by government because it was found in a court of law that he committed fraud.

Fraud vitiates everything.

A man steals a presidential election...

[Reily]

So you couldn’t find the words, trying for that penumbra “Living Constitution” argument.

We are either “Strict Constructionists - the text says what it says !” Or not !

[FreeReign]

So you couldn’t find the words, trying for that penumbra “Living Constitution” argument. We are either “Strict Constructionists - the text says what it says !” Or not !

I addressed your "Living Constitution" argument squarely, with the example.

You ignored it.

Or do you think that the government shouldn't seize a gun from a person after its been proven in a court of law that it was stolen.

A man steals an election...

[Reily]

You are interpreting not citing the text. You are seeing penumbras - “reasoning-by-interpolation”, in the text to back up your argument.

Again does the text back up what you say ? Word for word ?

Just find the word fraud in the text applied to anything! Find the vitiate applied to anything ?

So I didn’t ignore anything !

[FreeReign]

Okay.

Then you DO think that it's unconstitutional for government to seize a gun from a person after its been proven in a court of law that the person stole it.

[MayflowerMadam]

“Gaining the presidency through fraud nullifies a presidency. This principle is simply not only common sense it’s basic contract law.”

“Fraud vitiates everything” also is the focus of a SCOTUS decision in the 1800s. The election should be invalidated and made ineffective — according to SCOTUS.

“Fraud vitiates everything.” That enduring opinion was the crux of the landmark decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the above referenced case of the United States versus Throckmorton.”

[kiryandil]

 

[kiryandil]

 

[kiryandil]

humblecnnpuppet

[Reily]

In that case no.
It’s a property issue not a 2nd Amendment issue. It’s stolen property and by rights should be returned if possible to the owner. The fact that its a gun is just incidental.

[FreeReign]

In that case no. It’s a property issue not a 2nd Amendment issue. It’s stolen property and by rights should be returned if possible to the owner. The fact that its a gun is just incidental.

So then stealing a gun is not okay with the Constitution but stealing a presidential election is?

I think the key word in your argument is "stolen", which is the same as what was a "stolen" presidential election.

[kvanbrunt2]

Its a farther away screenshot of the same screen above it that is legible.

[Reily]

Please read the Constitution !
If the election is proven to be stolen in a court of law.
The Constitution gives the remedy. Impeachment by the House then trial conviction & removal by the Senate.
The rules are there I’m sorry you don’t like them.

[NobleFree]

Actually, US v Throckmorton weighs against overturning Xiden’s putative victory: “Fraud vitiates every thing, and a judgment equally with a contract; that is, a judgment obtained directly by fraud, and not merely a judgment founded on a fraudulent instrument; for, in general, the court will not go again into the merits of an action for the purpose of detecting and annulling the fraud.” - https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61

[FreeReign]

Actually, US v Throckmorton weighs against overturning Xiden’s putative victory: “Fraud vitiates every thing, and a judgment equally with a contract; that is, a judgment obtained directly by fraud, and not merely a judgment founded on a fraudulent instrument; for, in general, the court will not go again into the merits of an action for the purpose of detecting and annulling the fraud.

I don't think it says what you think it says.

[FreeReign]

By that same logic, then the Constitution offers no remedy for a stolen gun as I pointed out in my first post to you.

[NobleFree]

I’m sure you don’t. Have an actual argument to present in support of what you think?

[Reily]

It’s a state crime, property theft. The fact that it’s a gun is immaterial.

[Fury]

This is just so childish.

Music.

Edited clips.

Slow motion video pans.

Just childish.

How about this? Put together a video and paper with no music, no special effects. Just facts. No changed voices, no grayed out or blacked out speakers.

[FreeReign]

It’s a state crime, property theft. The fact that it’s a gun is immaterial.

The Constitution says no government confiscation of guns. Period.

So now you're forgetting about the literal words in US Constitution? That is the antithesis of your original argument.

So then how are these gun confiscation laws constitutional?

It's implied. It would be absurd if it wasn't implied. The gun was obtained by theft.

Fraud vitiates everything. Gun theft, presidential election theft, it vitiates everything! There is no Constitutional right to possess a stolen gun and all the rights that go with that gun. AND there is no Constitutional right to posses a stolen office of the presidency and all the rights that go with that office.