“Gaining the presidency through fraud nullifies a presidency. This principle is simply not only common sense it’s basic contract law.”
“Fraud vitiates everything” also is the focus of a SCOTUS decision in the 1800s. The election should be invalidated and made ineffective — according to SCOTUS.
“Fraud vitiates everything.” That enduring opinion was the crux of the landmark decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the above referenced case of the United States versus Throckmorton.”
Actually, US v Throckmorton weighs against overturning Xiden’s putative victory: “Fraud vitiates every thing, and a judgment equally with a contract; that is, a judgment obtained directly by fraud, and not merely a judgment founded on a fraudulent instrument; for, in general, the court will not go again into the merits of an action for the purpose of detecting and annulling the fraud.” - https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61
And what evidence is incontrovertible? What entity is going to legally remove a sitting POTUS? The answer to both questions is NONE.
There are various reasons why the founders included the electoral college in the constitution. A states legislators can have the electors vote any way they choose, regardless of the popular vote. This alone chooses the president, a process that was completed in December, with no valid dissent.
It is over, but y’all hopium dealers are probably going to keep this nonsense up till 2024, aren’t you?