So you couldn’t find the words, trying for that penumbra “Living Constitution” argument.
We are either “Strict Constructionists - the text says what it says !” Or not !
I addressed your "Living Constitution" argument squarely, with the example.
You ignored it.
Or do you think that the government shouldn't seize a gun from a person after its been proven in a court of law that it was stolen.
A man steals an election...