Did Fauci Just Accidentally Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Recovered Immunity?

One of the most frustrating elements of the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been the complete lack of attention given to recovered immunity. Health bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci rarely mention the fact that individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 infections likely maintain robust antibodies to protect against the virus for many months. These antibodies, along with T cells and B cells, may persist for years or even decades—or even a lifetime—based on what we know about other coronaviruses, including SARS.

Yet Fauci and Co. are still urging everyone, whether or not they’ve been previously infected, to get the vaccine—a novel approach to infectious disease management.

The medical community, for the most part, has been remarkably incurious about recovered immunity, aided and abetted by Democrats, the legacy media (and their social-media fellow travelers) who have stubbornly refused to question public health officials about the topic. A Cleveland Clinic study (still in preprint, not yet peer-reviewed) of more than 50,000 caregivers found that infection rates for those who had recovered immunity and those who received the vaccine were essentially the same. In fact, none of the previously infected caregivers monitored during the study were reinfected. Not a single one.

The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection remained almost zero among previously infected unvaccinated subjects, previously infected subjects who were vaccinated, and previously uninfected subjects who were vaccinated, compared with a steady increase in cumulative incidence among previously uninfected subjects who remained unvaccinated. Not one of the 1359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study.

A Cleveland Clinic study (still in preprint, not yet peer-reviewed) of more than 50,000 caregivers found that infection rates for those who had recovered immunity and those who received the vaccine were essentially the same. In fact, none of the previously infected caregivers monitored during the study were reinfected. Not a single one.

Not yet peer reviewed. How many of those "peers" will give a politically based review rather than a medically based one?

Not yet peer reviewed. How many of those "peers" will give a politically based review rather than a medically based one?

My thought exactly. Copy/download a PDF for future reference. That document is destined for the ash heap.

Have committed the crime of the centuries -stealing the election for a senile leftist and the ho, they know they must recruit enough voters to hold p[ower through the election process. So the demon rats are importing serfs to replace the black serfs who are no longer reliable to do as the demon rats command of them. This is happening right before our eyes yet people do not recognize their Republic is being seeded with qa new wave of wealfare drones who will vote “D” to keep the dole running. Sadly, these new recruits do not yet realize they are merely election fodder and will be set aside between elections just as the demonn rats did with black people.

“ The more they seek to cajole, to demand and even to bribe people to get these mRNA Trojan horses the less I want to comply”

How much you want to comply SHOULD depend on the facts and not how you feel about THEM.

Why is there one variant for each month -- planned ahead??

Sure. Right.

Let's see the rest of that page and what they're really talking about. Because for sure it isn't SARS CoV-2 variants.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.