Replies

VERY interesting Steve, thanks for posting the link.

I guess this helps explain the patients whose cancer was in remission starting up again?

Copying some of the data here in case twatter swatters the tweet.

Walter M Chesnut@Parsifaler FollowFollow @Parsifaler

THIS IS MY MOST IMPORTANT DISCOVERY TO DATE

1) THE SPIKE PROTEIN AS METATASTIC CANCER

The Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to interact with tumor suppressor p53. p53 mutations are the most common genetic alterations found in cancers and are observed in >50% of all tumors.

From the approximately 200 different single mutations already described in p53, several residues are considered as hotspots, including R248, R175, G245, R273, R249, and R282 (Petitjean et al. 2007). All of these residues are found in p53's core domain, which is responsible for its interactions with DNA.

For this reason, most of these mutants are incapable of exerting the wild-type (WT) level of transcriptional activity (Bullock et al. 1997).

The most frequent effect of p53 mutations is loss-of-function (LoF); however, GoF effects,such as increased migration, invasion, and metastasis, have also been observed. Mutations in the p53 gene occur in more than half of human cancers and often result in altered transcriptional activities.

METATASTIC CANCER AND PRION DISEASE

Recently discovered characteristics of the tumor suppressor p53 include its prion-like properties and cellular uptake mechanisms, which are related to its GoF and are associated with tumor formation and malignancy.

The implications are nothing short of cataclysmic.

S2 Subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 Interacts with Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 and BRCA: an In Silico Study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324311/

Aggregation and Prion-Like Properties of Misfolded Tumor Suppressors: Is Cancer a Prion Disease?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046694/

So to sum it up quickly, it stops our bodies tumor suppressors that routinely stop cancer cells from developing?

Walter M Chesnut @Parsifaler

Among other nasty cancer activities, yes.

endoc @endocdoc

Replying to @Parsifaler

For me, the greatest discovery is the awakening of the HERV's by the virus or its spike.

Would it be agreeable to say that, someone who has recovery-immuity has a “safe reservoir” of S1 spikes that will trigger a learned immune response with desired results?
Correspondingly, those with the vaccine are/have generated an unsafe (excessive) amount of S1 spikes through the modification of in-situ processes?
Lastly, since it is the S1 spike that causes malign results, does the over-abundance overwhelm the natural response allowing the S1 do its thing and “run wild”?

My cancer doc said I shouldn’t take the vax. (I wasn’t gonna anyway.) This was back in March. She said it was because the vax may mess with the immune response they were trying to achieve with the bcg treatments. There was a recommendation from the cdc

* * *

Nasty results of jab