Posted on 07/27/2021 8:20:37 AM PDT by MNDude
Background: Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements.
Luckily, I've managed to get one.
If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided.
Supplying the product:
"Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates... nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product."
"Pfizer shall decide on necessary adjustments to the number of Contracted Doses and Delivery Schedule due to the Purchaser ... based on principles to be determined by Pfizer ... Purchaser shall be deemed to agree to any revision."
Just to make it clear: "Purchaser hereby waives all rights and remedies that it may have at Law, in equity or otherwise, arising from or relating to:.. any failure by Pfizer to deliver the Contracted Doses in accordance with the Delivery Schedule."
(Excerpt) Read more at threadreaderapp.com ...
Death by lawyer. Sounds like a promising Columbo series.
And now you know why the various givernment dictators are pushing this horse shit
“Beware the BioPharma Industrial Complex “
I love Colombo! Just remake his 1st episode...”Prescription Murder”
Bump.
"Purchaser acknowledges the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."
Intel had a contract similar with Rambus.
Intel was forced to design substandard chips using Rambus until the contract expired.
The end result is Intel abandoned all projects using Rambus and Rambus died as a company.
SMH
“There are known knowns — there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns — that is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don’t know we don’t know.”
Donald Rumsfeld quote.
The above in my mind is a really good statement to remember. Especially when making a risk assessment.
Just because things work best using the Supply and Demand system, doesn’t mean one needs to be stupid about it. But, like they say - fear is the best salesman.
Bkmk
The most important quote perhaps of this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a quote made in 2015 by Peter Daszak.
Duszak, head of Eco-Health Alliance, is long-time collaborator with Dr. Fauci. For example, by October 2013, the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in Fauci’s NIAID-funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Daszak. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal in isolating and manipulating viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response as noted in an October 2013 article,"Isolation and Characterization of a Bat SARS-like Coronavirus that Uses the ACE2 Receptor" published in Nature.
Duszak in 2015 said, “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Feb 12. 6, Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses.
It’s not hard to figure that SARS-Cov-2 was not a public health crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective. And it’s the easiest thing to describe because they are the ones that said it. And the Ocham’s Razor reality is they've said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine countermeasure. And they needed the media to create the hype and investors would follow where they see profit.
When I see a person wearing a ski mask, waiving a gun, and standing with a bag of money in front of a bank; I will make the assumption that that person might be a bank robber.
Similarly, if I have somebody who says we need to use the media to hype a medical countermeasure which is in fact the injection of a synthetic, recombinant chimeric protein developed off of a computer simulation, I’m actually going to listen to the motivation for why that might be being done; I will listen to the person doing the manipulation who says investors will follow where they see profit.
You do not have anything else you need to rely on to explain the events of the last 20 months than the actual statement of the actual perpetrators.
I’m a little dense, and reading this sort of thing gives me a headache, so help me out:
If Pfizer gets paid whether they deliver or not, or whether or not there’s a therapeutic alternative, what do they care about Ivermectin?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.