I don’t know who they are.
What I notice is a lot of people trying to make the *vaccine* sound as scary as possible.
The vaccine is certainly not for everyone - and each person should make their own free decision about it.
But it makes no sense to scare people from it by posting anecdotal stories suggesting that it’s ‘bad’ in general, with no rigorous scientific evidence to back that up.
Naturally, this list will continue to grow unfortunately.
Keeping in mind that these reports are only a fraction of the data out there and only those reports that the praetorian guard media & tech have let out.
Psaki refuses to answer question on WH ‘breakthrough’ Covid cases… (07.23.2021)
‘Why do you need that information?’
Also keeping in mind, that these vaccines are NOT approved and licensed and are only available to the public at large because of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA). Each of the manufactures were given authorization to "prevent" covid. There is nothing in their EUA's about lessoning hospital stays or deaths. Only, prevention of covid.
Pfizer's EUA:
"the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used)."
Moderna's EUA: "Having concluded that the criteria for issuance of this authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act are met, I am authorizing the emergency use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19"
Janssens's EUA: "On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 for individuals 18 years of age and older pursuant to Section 564 of the Act."
Both Moderna and Janssen's EUA's are based on preventing covid. Is this what prevention look like? Pfizer's EUA is based on "may" prevent covid. OK, some wiggle room there. If 1 in one hundred million doesn't get covid, but the other 99,999,999 do after taking their experimental shot, they can say...look, our agreement is that it may prevent covid.
These vaccines were given Emergency Authorization to be widely distributed and administered to "prevent" covid.
How many people, especially those that are not elderly or have pre-existing health concerns who have gotten the experimental medicine, would have changed their minds if they knew they had a much higher percentage chance (than being reported by the govt & the manufacturers) of getting covid, that they would have to got back to wearing a piece of cloth over their mouth and nose and be limited to large indoor (& outdoor) events anyway?
Would they take the chance of getting one or more of the reported side effects knowing the above?
Are these error rates acceptable to meet those EUA's and keep these unlicensed vaccines widely available outside a typical controlled study phase?
AFAIC, if science and honesty were the driving force, their EUA's would be revoked.
Again, this was for informational purposes. For the record, for whatever it's worth...I'm generally pro pharmaceutical companies for the work they do in discovering and making medicine available to those that want/need it and I'm also generally pro vaccines...that are licensed.
You mean when the injection has something that makes your cells produce a foreign protein?
And stick it through the membrane of your cells, on the outside?
And then your own cells look more like a coronavirus than they did before you got the injection?
“But it makes no sense to scare people from it by posting anecdotal stories suggesting that it’s ‘bad’ in general, with no rigorous scientific evidence to back that up.”
It makes no sense either to promote this deadly substance that the government calls a “vaccine”when it is not a Vaccine at all.
When you’re taking this vaccine you have No idea what the government drones are injecting into you and you have No idea what the future health ramifications will be to your body. Since the Biden administration is preventing the release of information required to make a knowledge based decision.
The evidence to back up vaccine injury or death is banned from about everywhere. People post it here but you have to read it.
People already know that covid can kill, they hear that 24/7. They hear very little about how most people recover.
That said, the people are denied the information and truth about the efficacy and warnings about the safety of the shots. Nobody even asks about medical history of the person getting jabbed. They just do it to a person and move on.
This story is propaganda to scare people into the shot and to also shame them for not wanting to get it.
If someone wants it fine. People by now have made their decision about it. So why do they keep wanting to force people and punish people who have decided no to the jab?