VOTING INTEGRITY

various ^ | July 20, 2021 | KNARFknarf

[knarf]

Someone gave me this idea this morning ( 7/20 ) and I composed the meme.

[Admin Moderator]

Quit abusing the news forum.

[knarf]

It's attached to the activism forum.

Is it possible to erase the "news" part of it ?

[Admin Moderator]

And quit abusing the Activism sidebar, too.

[AlaskaErik]

I’m trying to make sense of what you’re trying to get across.

[knarf]

Isn’t an idea meant to address and correct/prevent voting fraud an activist event ?

[Repeal The 17th]

I think you should show the voters on a mobius strip.

[knarf]

If we had a camera at the voting trouble spots in America, we could at least document a valid count of voters entering.

Certainly not a truly scientific (by their definition ) calculation, but certainly a reasonable number that does not exceed the thousands being reported.

Didn't anyone learn what a REBUS is ?

[Magnum44]

I am also confused as to the message...and the line of people arent socially distanced

[knarf]

At least you researched.

[patriotsoul]

Who said voting in person was the problem?

[knarf]

See #8 above.

I'm prepared to explain and defend myself and ideas

[Vaduz]

NO VOTING INTEGRITY as long as democrats are in the arena.

[knarf]

A camera outside, and known it was outside, because it was announced in the newspaper it would be outside, would become part of any question regarding the validity of a vote at any particular voter location.

We all know the mail in vote is the abused element, but they can claim reasonable confusion, merely because there's no viably determined separation.

[knarf]

I sing Tenor ...

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Keep your day job!

That is incomprehensible.

Don’t old people vote?

[Vaduz]

That they are

[TheConservativeTejano]

Partner, we love that pic. Great post!!!

[Magnum44]

I get it now. A smart camera system could count in person voters.

Here is the short fall: 1) this doesnt help with mail in fraud. 2) Arent we already too deep into the surveillance of citizens society?

Cameras and open viewing of the counting and tabulation of votes is a necessity. However, while we are almost always under the view of some camera system these days, I dont encourage more of that, especially by big brother. If you were to replace your camera with a person counting people in, and comparing that to vote count, that would be ok by me, though I think thats already done in most polling places.

Valid, up to date voter rolls, where dead people have been scrubbed, and a voter ID requirement (show a state issued drivers license with valid address to compare with he voter rolls). No drop boxes and open mail ins except deployed military.

[Ingtar]

It does nothing about switched votes, which is the base of contention.