Replies

You obviously can't read. No, you didn't get a word straight about what I said, which I referred to the appointment of electors... NOT WHEN THEY CAST THEIR VOTES!

I wrote "No... that refers to a uniform protocol, a run-up time limit. It does not mean you have a single set day to 'choose' electors. It means there would be a cut-off day in which you must have completed the appointment/validation and resolved any challenges to delegate appointments by legal remedy of all electors that qualify to be an official delegate that has been given authorization to cast a vote in their respective state capitals that will be the same day for all states."

You are deflecting from your original argument that was, and I quote...

You said "... Has this guy even read the U.S. Constitution? It doesn’t say a whole lot about presidential elections, but it is absolutely clear and equivocal that all presidential electors must be chosen on the same day."

WRONG! and you have yet to admit your error.

I responded in conclusion "... there is no constitutional same-day choosing and you have not shown me that it is imposed by the constitution... it's not."

Now you are just trying to be smart, deliberately change the meaning of what I wrote, conflating appointment of delegates to the day of uniformity in casting their votes. You do this in order to end up on top with some cut/paste drivel you spent looking up the past 24 hrs in a desperate attempt to deflect away from your misunderstanding of the appointment powers of EC delegates by state legislatures... A pathetic attempt not to admit your understanding and assertions were... WRONG!.

You then add to your current reply...

You write "... However, this only works if a separate slate of electors has convened on the same day as the Electoral College vote and formally cast their votes for another candidate.

WRONG! Formality is irrelevant. Delegate legitimacy is the only thing that matters here. You think this is a game?... if you don't catch the fraud in 6 days it's too late? Just because a vote was cast doesn't mean it is irrevocable/immovable and must stand! Then why do audits exists, recounts and challenges allowed?... to make a costly show of futility, a farce that cannot change an outcome? National elections are no different then local ones... whether they are votes tallied from EC delegates or your local HOA! Fraud is Fraud! It is shown to have altered the outcome of an election... then the election is invalid, the outcome illegitimate, and the winners are usurpers.

You also write "... Retracting electors in the 2020 election at this point is like reversing an umpire’s bad decision in the 1978 World Series.

Also WRONG!

Knowing to have fraudulently certified a popular vote by the SOS, and followed up by the Governor signing a "Certificate of Ascertainment" that officially accepts/declares the SOS final 'fraudulent' vote certification as accepted and then pursuant to the SOS fraudulent certification... the governor knowingly validates the identifies of the EC delegates( that are now illegitimate and imposters), recognizing them as being the official de-facto legislature appointments made by the governor on behalf of the state legislature. No, it is NOTHING like reversing an umpires BAD decision... it's far worse, TREASON worse! Elected officials conspired to commit fraud, they lied, they altered documents and they certified manufactured numbers in order to steal an election.

No, it is you who are nuts and still misunderstand the EC process, the powers of the state legislatures and their powers of remedy when FRAUD is committed.