The first vaccine invented in history was EXPERIMENTAL.
The first heart transplant in history was EXPERIMENTAL.
The first surgery performed 2000+ years ago was EXPERIMENTAL.
The first sustained nuclear chain reaction was EXPERIMENTAL.
(in the basement lab at Univ of Chicago)
Without “experiments” science would not progress at all.
Ok, what is your point? Has anyone suggested there shouldn't be experiments or that people should have the freedom to voluntarily joint an experimental treatment?
Those same people should have an absolute right to not take a treatment experimental or not. The onus is on those demanding a treatment to prove the absolute necessity to submit to the treatment.