Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12
"Without “experiments” science would not progress at all.

Ok, what is your point? Has anyone suggested there shouldn't be experiments or that people should have the freedom to voluntarily joint an experimental treatment?

Those same people should have an absolute right to not take a treatment experimental or not. The onus is on those demanding a treatment to prove the absolute necessity to submit to the treatment.

75 posted on 07/23/2021 3:43:28 AM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: WHBates

There was a thread with a video of a fast-talking human rights speaker. She said that after the Nuremburg Trials they banned medical experiments forced on people.

Now some will say that these “vaccines” are not forced. Everyone can choose to get one or not. I guess it depends on what “forced” means.

Want to keep your job?
Want to visit your dying mom in the nursing home?
Want to go to the concert?
Want to see your fiance in Canada?
Etc.


76 posted on 07/23/2021 3:50:38 AM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: WHBates

It IS VOLUNTARY. I have not seen any jack booted troops breaking down doors and jabbing any non-vaccinated Americans.


77 posted on 07/23/2021 9:37:40 AM PDT by entropy12 (President Trump was the force behind warp speed availability of vaccines for Americans. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson