Posted on 07/18/2021 3:37:53 AM PDT by Kevmo
The possible explaining of some controversial effects by a vortexial atom model
Volume 4 Issue 2 - 2020 Marius Arghirescu State Office for Inventions and Trademarks, Patents Department, Romania
Correspondence: Marius Arghirescu, State Office for Inventions and Trademarks, Patents Department; Romania,
Published: April 30, 2020
Abstract In the paper is presented a vortexial pre-quantum model of atom, based on a vortexial type of electron’ and proton’ magnetic moment, resulted in a cold genesis theory(CGT) as etherono-quantonic vortex ( ) * B r (r ’) (r r ’), Γ =Γ +Γ > µ µµ µ of heavy’ tachyonic etherons (ms ≈10-60 kg; w>c)- generating the magnetic potential A, and of quantons (mh =h⋅1/ c2 =7.37x10-51 kg)-generating vortex-tubes B ξ that materializes the B-field lines of the magnetic induction, the proton’s magnetic moment resulting by a degenerate Compton radius. The model may explain the ‘hydrino’ atom, with n=½, the tachyonic speed of the electronic neutrino and the Kervran effect of biological nuclear transmutations.
By the multi-vortexial model of nucleon resulted in CGT, are explained also some astrophysical observation which sustains the CGT’s hypothesis of pulsatile antigravitic pseudo-charge and gravitational waves generating at the surface of a ‘black hole type star by matter→energy conversion, resulting also the possibility of cosmic dust’s cold forming.
Keywords: vortexial atom, hydrino, OPERA experiment, Kervran effect, antigravitic charge, gravitational waves
--------------------------------------------
The explaining of some controversial phenomena In accordance with the resulted relation: k⋅γ≅√(2a/r), by eqs. (7a) and (7b) it results also, for r→a, that a nuclear particle such as an emitted γ-quantum or a neutrino emitted in a β-transformation or in a mesonic transformation (π± →µ± + νµ), may be accelerated by the protonicΓA -vortex in a time of ∼10-23s to a speed vν =k⋅c with k >1, (exceeding the light speed, c). For example, for r=1.5 fm, k=1.19.
So, it is possible to explain by the theory, the result of the recent OPERA experiment5 in which was observed neutrins with a speed exceeding the light speed, emitted from a CERN’s accelerator and detected to the Gran Sasso lab of Italy, (“Nature”, 22 sept. 2011).
Is explained also the recoilless γ- radiation emission/absorption phenomenon, (the Mössbauer effect). In the same time, the value of ρR(r) for r→rµ a , explains “the stopped light” experiment (L.V.Hau, 2001) which evidenced the possibility to reduce the speed of a light beam which is passed by a small cloud of ultracold atoms of sodium forming a Bose-Einstein condensate.6
The resulted pre-quantum soliton model of atom, of T→0K, which degenerates in the Bohr-Sommerfeld’s model at T>0K, is also consistent with some other soliton models of atom [63] and allow the explaining of the electron transition on sub-fundamental level (n=1/2) in the hydrogen atom, (i.e: the “hydrino” atom7 ) observed in some experiments of cold nuclear fusion7 by the conclusion that the quantification of the electron number of an atomic energy level: N(n), corresponds to a superficial charge density σe of constant value for an energetic layer considered as having quasi-cylinder (barrel-like) form, of l- height and quantified re - radius, (Figure 1): Figure 1 Pre-quantum atom.
According to the model, the transition on sub-fundamental level (n=1/2) is specific to the hydrogen atom, (to the “hydrino” atom) by the condition Q(n=1/2)=e, (H-atom having a single electron), condition which gives by eqn. (10) a radius for the under-fundamental level orbital: N(½)=1, ⇒ro * (½) = e/(σe .2π.lσ ) = ro /2 (11)
For other atoms, with bigger mass, the transition on subfundamental level: (n=1)→(n’=½) results as possible by stimulated electronic transition, according to the model, (by laser excitation with:
hν = E1 - E½), resulting possible also the producing of “mascons” (concentrated mass, resulted by the atomic radius decreasing and stronger inter-atomic forces).
It results also that- by this possibility, it may be generated also a stimulated K½ -electronic capture to some atoms (such as Am), after electronic induced transition on subfundamental energetic level (n=1 / 2 ), according to the model, by a nuclear reaction in the form:1 ( ) 0A A e Z Z 1 p e n ;N e M ν + − − − + →+ + → (12)
The Kervran effect
An unexplained phenomenon by the usual physics was evidenced in 1962 by Louis Kervran and it refers to the phenomenon of atomic transmutations at low un-radiative energy, produced for stable isotopes by a biological organism.
Her assumption is based on previous observations of french chemist Vauquelin, who observed that a hen nourished with oats and water, produced of five times more calcium than the consumed quantity.
Prout observed also that an egg of one day has of four times more calcium than the fecundated egg. Reseaches concerning the variation of calcium indicated similar disproportions during the germination of the oats seeds (Von Herzeele, 1875‑1883) and barley, (Long, 1970).
During 1875 and 1883, von Herzeele conducted 500 analytical experiments which checked the growing of plants in controlled medium and he concluded that the plants can produce nuclear transmutations of some chemical elements.
Similar researches were done by Baranger from the Polytechnic School in Paris, 1947, who analyzed the content of Ca, K, and P in plants. His researches showed that the un-germinated seeds or germinated in distilled water doesn’t reveal a variable content of K, but the seeds treated with CaCl2 has an increased quantity of P, unexplained by the plants biology, and a growth of 10% of K.8
After Kervran, the living organisms can produce, in certain conditions, by bio-geochemical reactions, also nuclear reactions of elements as: C, N, O, Si, Na, K, Ca, P, S, Kl, by specific enzimes (transmutantenzimes) located intra-mitochondrial.9
For explain the effect of biological transmutations of chemical elements, L. Kervran considered a new nuclear model, as cluster of alpha particles with two types of links: hard and weak, considering that the weak links can be split enzymatically, so that an atomic nucleus can be divided in two nuclei by biological way, with the mitochondrial energy, the produced energy being a part of the total energy of the body.
We can observe that this nuclear model is in partial concordance with the equation (2) of nuclear potential periodical decreasing, resulted in CGT as consequence of the deuteronic self-resonance at the level of a heavier nucleus.
Kervran considered that Si is a “bio-consumed” element and Ca is a bio-produced element, being known that it is possible to reduce the lack of Ca in the human body and in the animal body (cow, pig) through the administration of Mg and Si (under different formsorganic or anorganic).
According to Kervran, the specific reactions are: 24 16 40 28 12 40 Mg O Ca; Si C Ca +→ +→
-------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
In the paper is presented a vortexial pre-quantum model of atom, based on a vortexial nature of the electron’ and proton’ magnetic moment, resulted in a Cold Genesis Theory as etherono-quantonic vortex: ( ) * B r (r ’) (r r ’), Γ =Γ +Γ > µ µµ µ of‚ heavy’ tachyonic etherons (ms ≈10-60 kg; w>c)- generating the magnetic potential A, and of quantons (mh =h⋅1/c2 =7.37x10-51 kg) - generating vortex-tubes ξB that materializes the B-field lines of the magnetic induction, the proton’s magnetic moment resulting by a degenerate Compton radius.
The model may explain the ‘hydrino’ atom, with n=½, the tachyonic speed of the electronic neutrino and the Kervran effect of biological nuclear transmutations.
By the multi-vortexial model of nucleon resulted in CGT, are explained also some astrophysical observation which sustains the CGT’s hypothesis of pulsatile antigravitic pseudocharge and gravitational waves generating at the surface of a ‘black hole type star by matter-energy conversion.
written by Arghirescu Marius, published by Open Access Library Journal, Vol.4 No.2, 2017
for the cold fusion ping list
[Vo]:Thermacore and the missing link to the Kervran effect
Jones Beene Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:53:22 -0700
A neglected paper and fringe theory, which may stand up to closer scrutiny,
appeared last year from Romania. It addresses the Kervran effect and the Mills
hydrino with a vortex model somewhat reminiscent of the recent “Berry”
superconductor theory.
https://medcraveonline.com/PAIJ/PAIJ-04-00204.pdf
The Kervran effect has an overlooked connection to one of the most convincing
experiments ever in LENR, involving the company Thermacore, Inc ... and their
work with Randell Mills plus the eventual patent nearly 30 years ago. The
important paper from that era has been removed from the BLP site: Thermacore,
Inc. “Final Report, SBIR Phase I, Nascent Hydrogen: An Energy Source.”
The Thermacore Patent, now expired, is 5,273,635 from 1993 Inventors: Gernert,
Shaubach, and Ernst Note: Randell Mills is NOT listed as co-inventor. Nor did
they mention the Kervran effect, but the did document a characteristic emission
line at 54.4 eV which Mills predicted. There was no radioactivity. One wonders
in hindsight if they would have found calcium after the year long run, should
they have looked.
Another missed opportunity?Consider this quote from Thermacore: “Light water
electrolytic experiments at Thermacore show positive results. The most
outstanding example is a cell producing 41 watts of heat with only 5 watts of
electrical input. The cell has operated continuously for over one year...” That
is a COP of 8, claimed by experts.
It bears repeating: THE CELL OPERATED CONTINUOUSLY FOR OVER ONE YEAR, and
remember, this statement is not coming from some fly-by-night self-promoting
entrepreneur, nor even university professors who are ignorant of manufacturing
realities - but instead it comes from one of the most well-respected of
high-tech firms in the World, in thermal engineering. This is the firm which
invented the heat-pipe and other related devices.
Yet it all came to naught. Go figure.
I have my own theories about the vortexial atom model. I’ll post them later.
Yet another mystery in this field.
Thermal diode for energy conversion
Abstract
Solid state thermionic energy converter semiconductor diode implementation and method for conversion of thermal energy to electric energy, and electric energy to refrigeration.
In embodiments of this invention a highly doped n* region can serve as an emitter region, from which carriers can be injected into a gap region.
The gap region can be p-type, intrinsic, or moderately doped n-type. A hot ohmic contact is connected to the n*-type region. A cold ohmic contact serves as a collector and is connected to the other side of the gap region.
The cold ohmic contact has a recombination region formed between the cold ohmic contact and the gap region and a blocking compensation layer that reduces the thermoelectric back flow component. The heated emitter relative to the collector generates an EMF which drives current through a series load.
The inventive principle works for hole conductivity, as well as for electrons.
US6396191B1
United States
InventorPeter L. Hagelstein
Yan R. Kucherov
------------------------------
------------------------------
Application US09/721,051 events
1999-03-11 Priority to US12390099P
2000-11-22 Application filed by Eneco Inc
2002-05-28 Application granted
2002-05-28 Publication of US6396191B1
2020-03-06 Anticipated expiration
The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson
The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Civil discussion of the involved science is desired.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.