Posted on 07/14/2021 8:28:53 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Charles Hoffe, who practices medicine at Lytton British Columbia, explained: “We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm. The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.
“These packages are designed to be absorbed into your cells. But the only place they can be absorbed is around your blood vessels and the place where they are absorbed is the capillary networks – the tiniest blood vessels where the blood flow slows right down and where the genes are released.
Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins. Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognises these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so your are then protected against Covid. That’s the idea.”
But instead, the product becomes part of the cell wall of the vascular endothelium. “So it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form because your blood platelets circulate round your blood vessels, and the purpose of blood platelets is to identify damaged vessels and stop bleeding. So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these Covid spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel.”
A blood test called a D-dimer blood test, clearly revealed this disconcerting development.
“The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.”
In performing D-dimer tests on his mRNA jabbed patients, Hoffe discovered that at least 62 percent of them had these microscopic blood clots.
“These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.”
This causes Reduced Effort Tolerance (RET) due to the blood vessels in the lungs being blocked. As a result, the heart needs to work harder to compensate for the blocked vessels. The condition is known as pulmonary artery hypertension, which inevitably leads to heart failure.
Spot on.
Ha! So true.
As if those numbers....and, the so-called “experts” who spit out those numbers....were honest.
CDC/NIH, etc ... lead by Head Liar Fraudci are the ones not to be trusted.
I worry about people who may pay attention to your apparent endorsement of one backwater physician,
Don’t worry, sure you calling him a backwater physician will prevent them from taking him seriously.
“I worry about people who may pay attention to your apparent endorsement of one backwater physician,”
What? Do you think I have some kind of following or something? Are you daft?
“The original post contains no rigorous scientific study to back up what the doc says. It’s all ‘belief’, to quote the title; and hearsay and opinion.”
Where’s your rigorous scientific study? Oops, I forgot YOU ARE THE STUDY. They did say they wouldn’t know the results of JABS until 2025. I think that’s the goal for compiling the results. Why don’t you get back to me in 2025 and let me know how it’s going?
“But you are ready to jump all over it, because YOU have fears - and mere opinions.”
You’re damn right I have fears. I FEAR THESE EVIL Bs WILL FORCE IT ON ME.
Have anything to say about issues raised here?
Something for the crimes against humanity deniers.
Do you think they’re going to hold you down and ‘JAB’ you against your will? (You write like a Brit - or is that just an affectation?)
I am requesting that you do not comment to me further.
Thank you.
Why should they take him seriously?
Giving serious weight to one anecdotal opinion from one doctor is not doing due diligence with regard to one’s own health.
Why should they take him seriously?
Of all the claims made since 2020, I doubt one person will make this thread the key factor in his decision.
I’ll do my best, if I even remember who you are. (I talk to a lot of people, here.)
Others have requested the same, over the years; but unless a person is really bad enough to go on my ‘LIST’, I forget whom I’ve offended after a while.
You may have to remind me, if I transgress.
Well, it seemed important enough to someone to post, and others to comment upon, on an internationally-read forum.
Should those of us who thought it was questionable simply have let it sit with no countering?
Should those of us who thought it was questionable simply have let it sit with no countering?
It’s good to consider different opinions.
Opinions are open to discussion.
So, we discussed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.