Posted on 07/14/2021 8:28:53 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Charles Hoffe, who practices medicine at Lytton British Columbia, explained: “We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm. The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.
“These packages are designed to be absorbed into your cells. But the only place they can be absorbed is around your blood vessels and the place where they are absorbed is the capillary networks – the tiniest blood vessels where the blood flow slows right down and where the genes are released.
Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins. Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognises these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so your are then protected against Covid. That’s the idea.”
But instead, the product becomes part of the cell wall of the vascular endothelium. “So it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form because your blood platelets circulate round your blood vessels, and the purpose of blood platelets is to identify damaged vessels and stop bleeding. So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these Covid spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel.”
A blood test called a D-dimer blood test, clearly revealed this disconcerting development.
“The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.”
In performing D-dimer tests on his mRNA jabbed patients, Hoffe discovered that at least 62 percent of them had these microscopic blood clots.
“These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.”
This causes Reduced Effort Tolerance (RET) due to the blood vessels in the lungs being blocked. As a result, the heart needs to work harder to compensate for the blocked vessels. The condition is known as pulmonary artery hypertension, which inevitably leads to heart failure.
Yep. I can confidently predict that in only 50 years time the majority of those who got vaxxed will have died of either heart disease or cancer.
Now we know how the globalist oligarchy will accomplish their population reduction to under a billion and eventually under a million of us serfs. Is it any wonder that the demon rats are trying to ruch the full vaccinate populace, before the evidence is too much to ignore? The demon rat party is as evil as any human org can be, and they want you dead and out of their way.
“ Couldn’t the same be said of Dr. Zelenko?”
Yes it could be said of him too. However, the difference between this backwoods doctor and that backwoods doctor (Dr Z ) is that Dr Z has anecdotal evidence to back up his claims. The Canadian doctor is just looking at the sky and speculating what might happen years down the road.
That is incorrect. Only about 20% of all MDs belong to the AMA, so no , most doctors have not taken the jab
I'm also confused by your use of the word "anecdotal." Wasn't Dr. Zelenko's patients actual real people known to him, who's treatments the doctor has recorded in his patients' files? He's not just repeating a story that he heard from someone else.
Maybe you meant to say that his treatments didn't follow the rigors of a clinical study, but they certainly weren't "anecdotal."
You'll pardon me if I sense a certain attitude of condescension in how you characterize these people. Is that meant to discredit them because you disagree with them, or do you feel that they are not worthy of being called doctors and should be shamed out of their profession?
-PJ
“Enough with the anti vaccination propaganda, if you don’t want it then don’t take it. Most doctors and medical professionals have taken it.”
How about enough with the forced vaccinations and then maybe we will shut up about it. When the Vaccine Nazis quit trying to force people to take it with ‘PUNNISHMENTS’ for those that don’t want it, shut the hell up, then I will gladly never mention it again.
Right now we have DOOR KNOCKERS in my state being helped by the NATIONAL GUARD. Governor Commie is still saying MANDATORY for children to wear nasty bacteria masks to school SINCE THEY ARE NOT VACCINATED.
All types of coercion is taking place constantly. Even the local news is pushing the thoughts that UN-VACCINATED are responsible for VACCINATED people getting sick. Like that makes any sense.
People being FORCED TO TAKE IT IN ORDER TO KEEP THEIR JOBS.
You want us to shut up, then you shut up first.
I’m not into all of the conspiracy theory extremes just the simple fact that these “vaccines” are not vaccines period. Anyone who thinks they are, are misinformed. It’s gene therapy and does little if anything to prevent getting the disease which is also no more than a cold.
Guess we’ll see the real effects in the next few years.
The government will never admit to its mistakes.
That being said, I’m far more concerned with the Biden administration and the damage it’s doing to America.
Just as the gypsy woman foretold
The first time I mentioned it in passing - maybe ever so slightly to dismiss his opinion based on his location, I will admit. I mean a family doc from Lytton, BC is not exactly a research scientist from Johns Hopkins. But it was not meant to be condescending. I generally try to look at the merits of someone's argument over who's making the argument
But when you repeated the phrase, for some reason it just sounded funny. I know it wasn't your description of Dr Zelenko - you were just pointing out that the same could also be said of him, but it still sounded funny. Suddenly we were talking about 'backwoods doctors'. A backwoods doctor here, a backwoods doctor there.. For humorous effect (maybe not to you) I repeated the phrase a few more times. But there was no condescension.. in the way elitist liberals condescend toward conservatives.
As for the (not)anecdotal bit, you are right, it wasn't anecdotal since Dr Zelenko himself treated patients with that drug combo and with great results. The difference is Dr Zelenko , even though "just a family doc", has hard evidence - and a lot of it - to back up his claims, whereas on the Canadian doctor's part it's just speculation on what might happen years down the road. His speculation would carry weight if he were a specialist in immunology, virology, etc and associated with a major research hospital - but he isn't.
When I read Dr. Zelenko's bio, I saw that he interned at the hospital in the area where I lived as a child.
Admittedly, it's not "backwater," it's in Nassau County on Long Island just over the NYC border. He now lives just north of Westchester County in New York, in the area that is just outside of the NYC metro area, and probably the beginning of what the city people think of as "upstate."
-PJ
Anybody can create a website, and start reporting ‘opinion’.
Do you believe all of them?
And what causes you to believe that this particular Canadian doctor is correct in what he says?
All the banned doctors, scientists, virologists, microbiologists...ect....trying to warn people or give another opinion seem highly qualified. You do realize that Dr. Malone, the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and INVENTOR OF THE mRNA VACCINES, has been banned from speaking about it, don’t you? He says NOT TO TAKE IT.
So who are you listening to? Only source of information approved on the news is coming from life long bureaucrats like Fauci and Birx. Other than them all you hear is “the CDC says” or “the NIH says”. Who are the unseen and unnamed experts at the CDC and NIH? What are their qualifications?
(It’s ‘etc.’, modern abbreviation for the Latin ‘et cetera’)
And all of the people touting ‘anthropogenic global warming’ are ‘highly qualified’, too.
Do you also believe them?
There are great differences of opinion between ‘highly qualified’ people, on just about every issue.
The vaccine should be a matter of choice for the individual. Many of us have decided that the benefit outweighs the risk.
Most of us who have decided to take it are not ‘stupid’.
But don’t worry - pretty soon, I’ll probably die of heart failure, and won’t be here to argue with you anymore.
Why do you people always deflect and never answer the question?
I will ask again, who are the unseen and unnamed experts at the CDC and NIH that you are listening to? What are their names and what are their qualifications?
Global warming is a hoax and I don’t give a shit about your little spelling correction.
Just tell us who the experts are and their qualifications that you are listening to.
My choice has been advised by my personal experience of - and the people who work in - the biomedical field.
There are issues with many vaccines, drugs and treatments.
I looked at everything, and decided that this was a good move for me.
Your mileage may vary - but you should quit trying to frighten people away from what may be a life-saving choice for the individuals who do choose it.
Your mileage may vary - but you should quit trying to frighten people away from what may be a life-saving choice for the individuals who do choose it.
or life ending.
All these experts that are coming out putting their faces, their names and their careers on the line to warn people of what they see coming that may be very DETRIMENTAL to the health of people taking the EXPERIMENTAL JAB are a lot more convincing than unseen and unnamed “so called” experts in your imagination.
“but you should quit trying to frighten people away from what may be a life-saving choice for the individuals who do choose it.”
Maybe you shouldn’t be trying to talk people into doing something you have no expertise to advise either way. I think people have a right to hear ALL THE INFORMATION, GOOD, BAD AND INDIFFERENT before they put something in their body they can’t get out that may be very harmful.
Now you see Jen Peesaki (that’s how I spell it in case you think you should correct it) coming out saying DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE BUT THE APPROVED INFORMATION FROM THE GOVERNMENT. Really? That doesn’t bother you? It doesn’t bother you that they lied about the cures to get people to get JABBED?
This is a DISCUSSION forum. If you don’t like the discussion on a post, why don’t you avoid it? You come here to criticize and disrupt people who are open to listening to someone other than the approved government message. Why do you want to steer people away from getting all the information they want? You said you made your choice that was right for you. Fine. Good. Now how about letting others do the same.
Remember this?............
I have not tried to ‘talk people into’ the vaccine. As I’ve stated numerous times, I believe it should be left to the choice and judgment of the *individual*.
But you don’t seem to realize that many, many people on this forum HAVE chosen to take the vaccine, and that you are not only suggesting that they were stupid and ill-advised to do so, but you are frightening some of them.
Do you think it’s your job - and that you have the ‘expertise’ - to frighten everyone here from their own good judgment?
God save me from all the people out there who want to ‘save’ me.
“But you don’t seem to realize that many, many people on this forum HAVE chosen to take the vaccine, and that you are not only suggesting that they were stupid and ill-advised to do so, but you are frightening some of them.”
How am I frightening people? I didn’t make the flipping videos. So because YOU are frightened, all information not agreeing with the government Kool-Aid from the bureaucrats and your decision, should be shut down. Who is making you come to the scary threads? Does someone have a gun to your head? Ignore the scary threads and go about your business. You made your decision and you’ve made it quite clear you were listening to experts and you knew what you were doing so why worry about what anyone says now? The title itself was a great warning for you, don’t you think?
I worry about people who may pay attention to your apparent endorsement of one backwater physician,
The original post contains no rigorous scientific study to back up what the doc says. It’s all ‘belief’, to quote the title; and hearsay and opinion.
But you are ready to jump all over it, because YOU have fears - and mere opinions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.