It is unclear what mDRNA is — however, D-dimer elevates in any inflammatory state — it is quite non-specific, and per this article is being touted as diagnostic — which it is not. This takes a D-dimer elevation about 14 bridges too far.
Yeah, except that he specifically mentioned measuring D-dimer 1 week after the jabs.
We know the spike protein, when it binds to ACE2 receptors (it cannot reconfigure and enter the cell, due to the insertion of the two prolines compared to the natural spike protein), tells the cell to pump out a bunch of inflammatory cytokines.
And 62% of those jabbed, more than coincidence, one suspects.
Certainly worth looking into further.
This presenter also apparently believes - or wants people to believe - injections are supposed to stay only at the injection site - we "now know" the injection doesn't stay in the arm, according to him.
They do indeed continue to top themselves with absurdity. But, they are making efforts to make things sound more substantive now vs. the posts like you are turning to metal and magnets will stick to your face if you are vaccinated.
The doctor pointed out that d-dimer is not completely diagnostic by itself.
On the other hand, your assertion that it is triggered by inflammation in general seems at odds with this description of the test. It seems very specific to formation and breakdown of clots. Can you cite a reference that refutes the content of this article?
https://labtestsonline.org/tests/d-dimer