[h/t Fractal Trader]
[h/t Fractal Trader]
[h/t grey_whiskers]
No one is checking to see how 'vaccination' programs are impacting overall public health (immune suppression/rise in other illnesses) and yet 'vaccinations' ARE impacting public health:
Posted on 07/13/2021 8:18:05 PM PDT by ransomnote
(h/t cathi)
[ransomnote: I appreciated this review of VAERS reports from researchers in Britain as the subject is otherwise untouchable in the United States. The PDF includes graphs, charts and excellent information.]
Authors: Scott McLachlan, Magda Osman, Kudakwashe Dube, Patience Chiketero, Yvonne Choi, Norman Fenton
Click Link to Start PDF Download
Clinically trained reviewers have undertaken a detailed analysis of a sample of the early deaths reported in VAERS (250 out of the 1644 deaths recorded up to April 2021).
[ransomnote: the CDC held records of deaths for many months and continues to upload reports of adverse events 'late'; around half of adverse events published to VAERS occurred December 2020 through Mar/April instead of loading more recent records. We still don't know any of the totals for types of events reported for those earlier months, and certainly have relatively little information from the time period when the most 'vaccinations' were occurring.]
The focus is on the extent to which the reports enable us to understand whether the vaccine genuinely caused or contributed to the deaths. Contrary to claims that most of these reports are made by lay-people and are hence clinically unreliable, we identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67%. The sample contains only people vaccinated early in the programme, and hence is made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions. Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.
SNIP
It has been suggested that a third category of submission may have been made by members of anti-vaccine, or other groups, motivated by ill-intent, who may exaggerate case numbers reported. Critics of safety reporting cite the fact that lay people, or those with malign intent, may form the bulk of reports and hence statistics on side effects must therefore be exaggerated because they come from non-credible sources. Set against this, research suggests that as few as 1% of the true adverse reactions ever get formally recorded. In early April 2021 we downloaded the 2021 Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) dataset with the aim to analyse these reports to determine the range and frequency of health problems potentially caused by the vaccines but also the quality of the reports, and by inference the credibility of the reporters lodging them. For each patient cited in a report, a clinically trained reviewer manually examines the report to determine its source and clinical credibility and to identify and record medical history, current illness, and symptoms. Each is then checked by a second reviewer.
[ransomnote: Normally the CDC announces the names of highly qualified reviewers who will participate in reviewing reports published to VAERS to determine if any are cause for concern (related to vaccination) and several months are required to review all the data connected to the cases.
Everything is different for Covid. This time, the CDC announced after the fact, that unnamed doctors from the FDA had reviewed the records and no relation between harm/death and 'vaccination' was found. The FDA physicians are not trained or qualified to perform this work. The CDC simply collaboarated with the FDA to rubberstamp EVERY record of death as unrelated to 'vaccines'. Source for this information, Dr. McCullough]
The majority of death reports in this interim dataset include some narrative description for the death event; whether a short clinical comment4 or a more comprehensive narrative including elements of the patient’s medical status prior to and/or post vaccination, similar in detail to that shown in Figure 1.
On reading these it became apparent that some nursing or clinical staff felt it important to expressly distance vaccine administration from the resulting death. It was difficult to tell whether this was to avoid the negative mainstream media perceptions of being vaccine hesitant or anti-vax, to distract potential blame being levelled at the care organisation or healthcare provider who authorised and administered the vaccine, or was simply because they had an honest5 belief in absolute vaccine infallibility.
For 8 recipients6, even absent evidence to support the assertion, it was reported categorically that the vaccine could not have had any causal relationship to the recipient’s death. For 4 recipients7 it was claimed, even in spite of evidence to the contrary, that COVID had caused their deaths because the vaccine had insufficient time to save their lives.
For many of the elderly and infirm, the description of death often asserts a pre-existing or age-related condition as the more likely cause of death, including cancers and long-standing cardiac pathologies8
Also, for 12 recipients (5%) we are expressly told that one or more negative COVID-19 PCR test results were returned in the hours or days prior to the vaccine recipient’s death.
In spite of the fact that only 11 (4%) present with a test-confirmed and current COVID-19 infection, all 250 people in this interim collection were reported as COVID-19 deaths. This means that all, even those who received one or more negative test results, are erroneously counted in the officially reported national COVID-19 death tally.
[ransomnote: This information seems to confirm annecdotal information asserting that vaccination deaths are counted as Covid deaths. This would also confirm reports that deaths and hospitalizations are mostly among the vaccinated, despite false assertions from the CDC. Examples Scotland and Israel.]
[h/t Fractal Trader]
[h/t grey_whiskers]
No one is checking to see how 'vaccination' programs are impacting overall public health (immune suppression/rise in other illnesses) and yet 'vaccinations' ARE impacting public health:
PING
Nice to have the opportunity to read a 3rd party review of 250 cases of death published to VAERS following Covid ‘vaccinations.’
This just about tells the whole story.
BTTT!!!
One of the most amazing parts of this whole mess, is that we rolled out a completely experimental injection to the masses, and the only adverse event recording system we have is passive. If we are determined to roll out an experimental so widely, our adverse event system should be active not passive. We should be watching every vaccinated person like a hawk. If they get so much as a runny nose, it should be reported and we should be looking diligently into it.
A passive system during the biggest trial in human history? Absolutely unacceptable in every way shape or form.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's actually worse than that. Instead of fixing this failed passive system which research showed collected less than 1% of adverse events actually experienced, the CDC rolled out a SECOND PASSIVE system called V-Safe.
The CDC created V-Safe to corral adverse events before they reached the public. V-Safe is a phone app that collects adverse events reports which are kept privately available only to CDC. This is why there aren't more adverse events in VAERS.
V-Safe is passive and several million people signed up for it, but in reality only about 7% of those receiving vaccines enrolled in V-safe, so while that phone app keeps the truth from showing up in VAERS, it's still a failed, second passive system that few people use. They don't want VAERS to work so they don't fix it. They don't want people to report to VAERS so they create a phone app to divert information into a private database.
FReeper Cathi provided the following info about V-safe :
Someone dug into it and this info is interesting.
She found that “Everyone who gets vaccinated will be encouraged to register for the V-SAFE tool.”. Fun fact, she read the pamphlet and registered. I was told nothing and of course I read nothing so didn’t register. So I wondered what the conversion rate was.
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
23h
She found the following: “More than 90 million Americans have received at least one shot, yet the CDC’s v-safe monitoring program has only 6 million participants”. That’s a 6.6% conversion rate. At least does everything reported get to VAERS?
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
23h
“Anyone who reports a clinically important event — missing work, being unable to do normal daily activities or receiving medical care — will get a follow-up phone call and a report may be filed in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)”
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
23h
So basically, it relies on self-reporting, and then being able to answer a call, and then (something) “may” be filed as a report to VAERS. What percentage of events are we supposing is going in to VAERS here? My intent is not to create fears of vaccines, but this is madness.
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
Jul 7
If, as a startup founder, I cared about collecting the data in my pipeline, and my analytics team showed up with this system as representative, they would no longer be my analytics team. This is not what one does when they truly want to gather all data.
The fR docs and paid government hacks on here would say show me the autopsy reports yet when it comes to covid deaths, they couldn’t be bothered. They just keep spewing the same tired lies. 500,000 died of covid.
Most of that is just false. Why post it?
Great graphic!!
#TRUTH
Absolutely agree. And the workers we need to do this are collecting their government checks and going home to access facebook or twitter, or their favorite msm fake news outlet...have wine and mary jane..and watch netflix, or marvel, or disney poopaganda.
RE: Most of that is just false. Why post it?
So that you can tell us what you think is false. Go for it!
In the beginning, every death was Covid related, now with vaccines they are going out of their way to say nope, not related.
When your relative, loved one dies a short period of time after having the vaccine, not much is gonna convince you that it was anything otherwise. When children see their healthy 50 yr old dad die 57 days after getting the second jab, what else are they supposed to think? The hospital sent him home. The coroner didn’t release the body in a timely manner, so they had to have the funeral without it.
bookmark
How about telling us which part is false and providing the backup or are you a Fake Checka.
Great a passive system to feed the passive system.
My gut tells me they are so evil, TPTB are doing this INTENTIONALLY and the ‘P’ stands for all the negative connotations certainly not ‘Powers’.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One of the most amazing parts of this whole mess, is that we rolled out a completely experimental injection to the masses, and the only adverse event recording system we have is passive.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s actually worse than that. Instead of fixing this failed passive system which research showed collected less than 1% of adverse events actually experienced, the CDC rolled out a SECOND PASSIVE system called V-Safe.
Shut up, Coomer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.