Posted on 07/13/2021 7:49:29 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan, who regularly attends Trump rallies and interviews supporters of the former president, got quite the shock while interviewing attendees of the Conservative Political Action Conference in Dallas over the weekend. Most of the people O’Sullivan interviewed gave answers that have come to be expected. One man said he thinks the election was probably stolen from Trump, while a woman said she finds it very questionable that Trump lost. Another woman said that she would like to hear Trump say in his speech on Sunday that he would “regain his rightful seat as president” as soon as the election is overturned. Those are common answers to O’Sullivan’s questions, which is why he appeared genuinely shocked when speaking to a man who goes by Grizzly Joe.
“Do you accept Joe Biden won the election?” O’Sullivan asked. Joe bluntly answered, “Yeah.” A stunned O’Sullivan followed with, “So you are, you know, one of the very few people I am likely to meet here this weekend who will tell me that Biden won the election fairly.” “That's unfortunate,” Joe replied.
Joe took issue with the many claims made by Trump’s lawyers while fighting the election results, without ever producing any real evidence, especially Sidney Powell’s who in November described her litigation, which ultimately failed, as “releasing the Kraken.”
“I gotta have the evidence. I gotta see it,” Joe said. “If you tell me you're gonna release the Kraken, show me the freakin’ Kraken for crying out loud. Show me the freakin’ Kraken. Show me a piece of the Kraken. Show me something.”
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
“I gotta say I’m with Grizzly Joe. Other than the sworn affidavits that Giuliani has shown to various state legislature hearings”
Why on earth do you think they are doing everything they can to make sure we do not see the evidence that substantially proves the election was stolen? If they act guilty then there might be a reason for that.
Re: 37
Way to work getting all oars spilling in the same direction - by calling someone an idiot that does not hold the same viewpoints as you.
Good ‘honkin grief.
Work on your reading comprehension, whould ya?
I "know" the election was stolen. Show me the LEGAL PROOF that it was stolen, please!
Only someone lying or delusional would think that statistical anomalies equates to proof beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Show me the legal proof that the election was stolen. Show me the stacks and stacks of mail-in ballot signature envelopes with chicken scratchings that couldn't possibly have matched the voter signatures on file with the county election clerk's office.
Like you, I "know" the election was stolen but, unlike you, I also know what standard of evidence is required in a court of law. All that Grizzly Joe and myself are saying is that we have not seen the PROOF yet.
What I gathered from what I viewed in the livestream of Trump’s speech is that there were a few hecklers/protesters in the room who made their presence known.
“I gotta have the evidence. I gotta see it,”
Quit watching CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC and ABC and try FOX News or OAN.
>>But once all the tallies were submitted and certified, challenges rebuffed, it was legal.
There was bipartisan consensus to steal the election for Biden.
Refusing to hear cases/evidence did not disprove any allegations.
I suspect you would have found much skepticism, not so much about whether fraud happened, as about whether it can be proven and whether it determined the result of the election.
And you can believe that the election was stolen in key states and still not believe that President Trump won a majority of the nationwide popular vote, let alone a popular vote landslide.
I would tell Donie not to assume that people who disagree with him all think alike and not to be surprised that people who disagree with him don't always agree with one another. Don't prejudge the venue either. CPAC always has people of different minds.
Very disappointed in you. If everyone had your attitude then we would not ever have chance to get anyone good in the country elected again. The bad guys control the ballot box.
I hear you, but I maintain that, where the Constitution is actually silent, as it is with stolen elections, the fraudulently elected official’s title and actions are void ab initio and should ultimately be declared so, once findings of fact have been duly entered in Court.
Again this is Yahoo news, someone paid for this story, and probably got a good rate.
It’s fake news!
Papering over windows, kicking out poll watchers, making them stand 20 ft away, pulling out hidden suitcases, feeding the same ballots in the machines multiple times, pictures of machines connected to the internet, yet you don’t see the proof?
The states sent their electors. If the states spent the time to investigate the issues of fraud and held back their electors, we’d be in a very different situation. But it’s important to remember that the American people do NOT elect the President of the United States; the Electoral College does. And the states are empowered to select their electors in any way they see fit. They could do it by lottery or by armed combat trials. Totally up to them.
There is no going back. We must focus on exposing the fraud that took place and FIXING the election processes that enabled fraud to happen, particularly in the places where it was most difficult to demonstrate. The election PROCESS must be addressed. The 2020 election was over the moment the electors cast their ballots. Ensuring that future elections are fair and transparent is the priority.
Exactly !!
Very well said !
Spending time on fantasy scenarios is a waste of time. It may make you feel good but that’s all it will do.
It should be clear by now that no court will hear the case, so isn't it time for the "kraken" to be released to the court of public opinion? Aside from the ongoing audits, we're way past preserving the "legality" of the evidence from the Trump campaign, so just dump what's been gotten already.
-PJ
They found one! Time to buy a Lotto Ticket.
Obviously the guy they interviewed is too lazy or disinterested to try and look up any of the “irregularities” for himself.
This concerns me a bit because I'm not convinced that the folks attending and watching the current Trump rallies realize this. When they find out that proving election fraud does not equal making Trump president RIGHT NOW, what happens next?? Are we back in civil war territory? I suppose it depend on how it comes out.
I grew tired of the hyper-hyperbole too !
I don’t understand the reasons Wood & Powell did this. It seemeed to me to be very poor strategy. I think it did little good, maybe much more harm then good.
Looking back it makes me wonder if doing harm was the intent.
No worries. Trump is not about to egg them on to something rash, and they’re solid people. We have never been in civil war territory, not on January 6, nor ever. This is a leftard delusion. What goes on in Washington is not any major concern. We’d all like for Trump to be POTUS right now, but that’s not happening.
What we really need is for people to trust the results of the election, and if there was fraud, it needs to be uncovered, and the perpetrators prosecuted. That would not be Biden, necessarily. If that’s never even looked into, we’ll have civil war sooner or later. It’s a matter of time.
Only thing that would definitely cause a civil war is if the leftards decide to mess with people where they live. Go door to door confiscating guns or forcing vaccines, or forcing people to kneel for eight minutes and apologize for being white, and you’ll have a civil war. Murder children for riding their bikes on your lawn, and get released without bail, and watch what happens to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.