Only someone lying or delusional would think that statistical anomalies equates to proof beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Show me the legal proof that the election was stolen. Show me the stacks and stacks of mail-in ballot signature envelopes with chicken scratchings that couldn't possibly have matched the voter signatures on file with the county election clerk's office.
Like you, I "know" the election was stolen but, unlike you, I also know what standard of evidence is required in a court of law. All that Grizzly Joe and myself are saying is that we have not seen the PROOF yet.
Let's get it out -- you're calling Trump a liar? Face it. You're not a conservative. You're a Republican establishment lap dog. Is your first name Ronna?
Explain what happened at State Farm Center. Explain why Democrats kept poll observer's out that had legal right to be there in places like Philadelphia. Why have the Democrats tried to stymie ever attempt at an audit?
And, what about the one audit that is ongoing? Are telling us the Arizona audit isn't going to reveal massive voter fraud that flipped the state to Biden? And, if that happens, my guess is you're claim the audit was rigged.
Yes, sure. Trump wins 19 of 20 bellwether counties that voted with the winner SINCE 1980 and just coincidence he lost?
Trump got 12 million more votes than the first time he ran and become the first President in 132 years to lose after getting more votes for reelection than election?
That is logically impossible without voter fraud. You're joke. Either a RINO or liberal troll.