[xkaydet65]

I don’t disagree with your reasoning, especially since uncorroborated decades old accusations of sexual misconduct are right out of the Left’s playbook. But his accuser in this case wase testified and was subject to rigorous cross examination and was believed.

[OldGoatCPO]

The Court didn't address the accuser, even if in real sense she was totally unbelievable, the accuser always gets a pass. It was the prosecution bring in the five #metoo women to make her accusations more believable that caused the sentence to be vacated. If the prosecution had to do that it makes me wonder how much the jury believed the victim after her cross.