I have mixed feeling about this. First, most of these cases where women were “taken advantage of” involves the woman consenting 95% of the way. If you get to the point that a person can drug you, you are more than mildly culpable.
I don’t go for this “I said ‘no,’” after the pants come off. You are the author of your sexual destiny, unless someone abducts you off the street and forcibly rapes you.
“If you get to the point that a person can drug you, you are more than mildly culpable.”
Soooo, just entering a party and getting a drink, then?
Drugging people is wrong, M’kay?
But if a drug has to introduced to the scenario, it would indicate he knew it wasn't going to happen without it.
I’ve thought about that, too. Used to be, many women that were assaulted wouldn’t come forward and press charges. Now, there are any number of women who will have consensual sex and then play the “litigation lottery” or make downright false accusations for political gain, money, or just vindictiveness, and they have NO shame....
The introduction of drugs to incapacitate the victim completely invalidates your viewpoint. Furthermore at no point is it justified to force anything on another person regardless of whatever transpired beforehand.
I agree that all people, men and women both, need to take responsibility to keep themselves out of situations that put them at risk, be it unwanted sexual activity or other bad situations. If every female that every consented to making out at the prom had to engage in intercourse afterward based on the discretion of her date very few would graduate high school without getting knocked up.
the caring and love in your post for victims is underwhelming....
you know there are people that say even if you were abducted off the street and forcibly raped they would question WHY WERE YOU ON THE STREET?