[livius]

Yes, it’s ridiculous. The article mentions that he had supposedly written something anti-Semitic and therefore the “[spokesperson] speculated that he may have been trying to reach the Jewish temples in the neighborhood” with the stolen truck. Pretty broad speculation.

And as for the people he shot after he crashed, he had no way of knowing who was going to be in or around that building, and obviously just shot whoever it was easiest to hit.

Don’t get me wrong, this is a terrible thing and I’m sure the guy was nuts and obviously very full of irrational anger and was probably on a suicide mission. It would have been nice if an armed citizen could have prevented him from stealing the truck in the first place.

But to try to fit it into the “white nationalist terrorist” narrative is intentional manipulation of the facts based on nothing but “supposition” from the same group of folks who are still “looking for motives” when somebody screams Allahu Akbar and kills a crowd of non-Muslims.

But ideology-based “supposition” is apparently the new facticity of the left.

[freeandfreezing]

It is almost like somebody found a made to order lunatic for a mission that fits the current Democrat talking points.

about the murderer. He must be mentally ill, and something triggered his behavior. His history certainly doesn't support how he is portrayed by the DA.

[Bob434]

[[But to try to fit it into the “white nationalist terrorist” narrative is intentional manipulation of the facts based on nothing but “supposition”]]

That is precisely what democrats do, make crap up, falsely accuse others, then impeach them like they did with Trump, and throw them In Solitary confinement like they have with the Capitol peaceful protestors.

Liberals are the new mafia

[Capt. Tom]

....snip..But ideology-based “supposition” is apparently the new facticity of the left.

Agreed.

It is so difficult today to just get the facts without the authors opinion dominating the slanted news articles. -Tom