VAERS data are just unverified submissions - possible events that need to be investigate, by themselves they are indicative of nothing.
That would be like reading the amazon product reviews and assuming they have all been proven accurate - they are not.
Besides that, 10-15 percent of all pregnancies end in miscarriage, so if you want to prove something has to do with the vaccine, you are going to have to compare it to a control group - 3000+/- possible miscarriages, while sad, says absolutely nothing by itself; last I saw more than 125K pregnant women have had the vaccine - if the 10-15 percent miscarriage rate holds than you would expect 12-18K miscarriages from that group at a minimum; your data says 3k+/-, so in fact that is a much lower number - so maybe the covid vaccine is actually decreasing miscarriages? (see how easy it is to twist statistics to prove anything you want).
Age makes a difference to risk levels:
If a woman is under 30, she has a 1 in 10 chance of miscarriage
If a woman is between 35 and 39, she has a 2 in 10 chance of miscarriage
If a woman is over 45, she has a 5 in 10 chance of miscarriage.
Fake equivalence.
The unknown here is that these miscarriages all happened shortly after the jab.
What you’d have to do is make bins for each day since conception, and find the miscarriage rate in the general population occurring on that day of gestation. Then compare that to the jab.
Oh and back out confounding factors like drinking, smoking, drug use, maternal age, car wrecks, other diseases, etc.
That’s a great question. Actually, it’s the only relevant question. And the answer isn’t that surprising:
“no differences have been seen when comparing pregnant women participating in the v-safe pregnancy registry with the background rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes.” - American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
In other words, the rate for miscarriage, stillbirth, etc. is entirely unchanged between those who get vaccinated for COVID-19 and those who do not.