I find most global warmers are easily flummoxed by:"You say the earth's climate is warming at dangerous rates. If you had the power to set the earth's thermostat, what would be the optimum temperature? Where would you set the thermostat? What is the ideal mean temperature we should all be striving to achieve?"
Demand that they provide a specific number, and when they balk, ask how they can be so sure we're rising above what it should be.
>> find most global warmers are easily flummoxed by:”You say the earth’s climate is warming at dangerous rates. If you had the power to set the earth’s thermostat, what would be the optimum temperature? Where would you set the thermostat? What is the ideal mean temperature we should all be striving to achieve?”
Demand that they provide a specific number, and when they balk, ask how they can be so sure we’re rising above what it should be.<<
That is a great summary of my argument - I can save time using that version.
But I always add SCIENTIFICALLY as they CLAIM to be the ideology of science but know next to nothing about it and I am well versed in it.