Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CheshireTheCat

Here’s another article regarding the younger people:

The Jabs Must Be BANNED
[Comments enabled]

... in those under 18 and strongly discouraged in healthy adults under 50.

Those who promoted them in people under the age of 30 in addition must face justice. There was never any science supporting it on a risk:benefit basis.

The CDC documents about 35 total Covid-related deaths in people under the age of 18 years all the way back to March of 2020.

This table is utterly gob-smacking damnable and is what we get for “Warp Speed” — a litany of serious harms, many of which will wind up as deaths — more deaths in those under 18 than Covid caused.

(CHART @ LINK BELOW)

The experience .vs. expected rate is anywhere from ten to one hundred times higher than “random chance” in those under 24 years old, and form 3-30 times higher in those under 30.

If we presume that one in ten of these cases will eventually kill the person involved, which is likely conservative

(the usual expectation is that half of these cases in the population generally that result in hospitalization eventually progress to heart failure and either a transplant or death within five years)

these “side effects” will kill more people in the under-25 group than Covid has all the way back to the start of the pandemic.

The others, who are not killed, will wind up with monstrous medical bills they will have to pay and some amount of permanent damage to their cardiac health.

...snip...

Link to see the chart and rest of the article:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242766


856 posted on 06/24/2021 8:27:07 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]


To: Unrepentant VN Vet

.


858 posted on 06/24/2021 8:30:11 PM PDT by Unrepentant VN Vet (Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? And I said, Here am I; send me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]

To: greeneyes

I guess this is what happens when you have so many people who are blessed never to have had a serious health issue and having to weigh pros and cons of different treatment options. They don’t know how to seek other opinions, read up on medical literature, and analyze risk-benefit.

I once had to resort to taking an expensive off-label drug I feared taking due to possible side effects. I was worried if I didn’t do something I would suffer permanent nerve damage (sciatica). Put it off as long as I could.

The side effects I read about weren’t as scary as myocarditis. Finally, relented and took the drug because surgery was far to risky and my condition was getting worse.

It worked. Totally got rid of the problem.

Side effects? One. It made me crave water. It was weird. It wasn’t so much that I was thirsty. I really did crave water. It went away when I stopped taking the drug.

The side effects it had on others were things like migraines, being hot, bad acne, bad hair loss.


871 posted on 06/24/2021 8:53:45 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson