If the first thing and premise for authority is a huge exaggeration that's a big red flag.
Here is what they are doing.
Speculating.
What they are saying is theoretical. It's not necessarily bad scientific theory, perhaps it could be proven. Perhaps it is true in some cases.
But they are making it up that they know these things as fact.
**********************************************************************************
Well, according to NOVOTECH, he is an inventor of the technology.
NOVOTECH is a “leading regional full-service contract research organization (CRO) in Asia-Pacific providing clinical development services across all clinical trial phases and therapeutic areas and global product development and regulatory affairs consulting through our in-house BioDesk team”
And this is what they wrote:
Dr Malone brings more than 20 years of management and leadership experience in academia, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology with deep expertise in regulatory and medical strategy for global clinical product development. Dr Malone is an internationally recognized physician and scientist for his work in the areas of clinical trials, vaccines, gene therapy, bio-defense, and immunology and specifically as one of the original inventors of DNA vaccination and multiple non-viral gene therapy technologies (RNA and DNA).
And here is one of his original documents:
Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection | PNAS
Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection R W Malone , P L Felgner , I M Verma Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 1989, 86 (16) 6077-6081; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6077
https://www.pnas.org/content/86/16/6077
You must not have even listened to the same things I have listened to. They basically said there are things that should be investigated further. And other well-qualified doctors have stated that there should be a halt to determine what is going on.
That seems prudent to me. And vaccinating children is totally irresponsible without learning more about what is going on. Especially since we now know that it is not staying stuck around the injection site.
Yes. There were a lot of people working on liposome mediated transfer tigon in the 80’s.
He’s certainly not the inventor of the system being used in these two RNA vaccines.
A pioneer in the field would be appropriate.
That’s why I stated it was an exaggeration.
Read the abstract, I will paste it in below, and see they were working on transfecting cell lines. In vitro work meant for research purposes. Not in vivo gene therapy application. (Pointing this out is not a knock on their work at all. It was very good science.)
—
We have developed an efficient and reproducible method for RNA transfection, using a synthetic cationic lipid, N-[1-(2,3-dioleyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (DOTMA), incorporated into a liposome (lipofectin). Transfection of 10 ng to 5 micrograms of Photinus pyralis luciferase mRNA synthesized in vitro into NIH 3T3 mouse cells yields a linear response of luciferase activity. The procedure can be used to efficiently transfect RNA into human, rat, mouse, Xenopus, and Drosophila cells. Using the RNA/lipofectin transfection procedure, we have analyzed the role of capping and beta-globin 5’ and 3’ untranslated sequences on the translation efficiency of luciferase RNA synthesized in vitro. Following transfection of NIH 3T3 cells, capped mRNAs with beta-globin untranslated sequences produced at least 1000-fold more luciferase protein than mRNAs lacking these elements.