I post my own facts and research. If you already posted the paper that I posted, I didn't see it. In the future, please ping me if you post any papers or scientific sources. If you don't or won't I'll assume you have none.
If I hadn’t flamed the crap out of you and taken it to pieces (remember, you were posting it for ransomnote to try to discredit her)
I assumed it was a he. No wonder the rest of you circle the wagons. Very chivalrous of you. No I merely pointed out "her" labeling of any study "she" doesn't like as Gates foundation funded.
Yes, you did point out very cogently that three people and no controls is not a study. But you have yet to post your sources of spike protein amounts in anyone. Instead you post your calculation like 100 million spike proteins per ml of blood. I point out that the inject 25,000 times more spike proteins into mice to get a negative effect.
If you had any scientific chops at all you would point out that's a standard toxicology test, to inject a large amount, look for adverse reactions and extrapolate the danger to smaller amounts.,
Because unlike you, I am am scientific although as you pointed out, I sometimes overlook things like the three person study. Unlike you I don't resort to innuendo about dangers. I am open minded, I believe there are some dangers in all vaccines and more in these new ones. But I want the facts. Even your facts if you present some.
You're a liar or bone-crushingly stupid.
Read the paper.
IF you can.
They were not vastly overdosing with spike protein and then waving around the results "OMG spike protein bad!" as you falsely accuse them of.
They already knew the spike protein was bad; they were trying to suss out the inflammatory pathways by which the clotting occurred.
If you'd bothered to read the paper, troll, you'd have seen that the first half of their experiment was in TEST TUBES.
If you were trying to discredit it as applicable, you'd have used that.
But even more telling, the 2nd half, they were using mice infused with HUMAN transgenic ACE2 receptor cells.
At this point, it's clear they're not trying to "prove" the spike is dangerous.
But you have yet to post your sources of spike protein amounts in anyone. Instead you post your calculation like 100 million spike proteins per ml of blood.
Nice lie. I said a billion. In your response to where I said a billion, you said you checked my numbers, and they are correct. Post YOUR work. I already posted mine in a post before you mentioned anything.
If you had any scientific chops at all you would point out that's a standard toxicology test, to inject a large amount, look for adverse reactions and extrapolate the danger to smaller amounts.,
That's what you'd LIKE to accuse them of doing.
But they were studying the various clotting pathways.
And you claim to be "scientific".
No, not in the slightest.
Troll.
And over your head intellectually.