You're a liar or bone-crushingly stupid.
Read the paper.
IF you can.
They were not vastly overdosing with spike protein and then waving around the results "OMG spike protein bad!" as you falsely accuse them of.
They already knew the spike protein was bad; they were trying to suss out the inflammatory pathways by which the clotting occurred.
If you'd bothered to read the paper, troll, you'd have seen that the first half of their experiment was in TEST TUBES.
If you were trying to discredit it as applicable, you'd have used that.
But even more telling, the 2nd half, they were using mice infused with HUMAN transgenic ACE2 receptor cells.
At this point, it's clear they're not trying to "prove" the spike is dangerous.
But you have yet to post your sources of spike protein amounts in anyone. Instead you post your calculation like 100 million spike proteins per ml of blood.
Nice lie. I said a billion. In your response to where I said a billion, you said you checked my numbers, and they are correct. Post YOUR work. I already posted mine in a post before you mentioned anything.
If you had any scientific chops at all you would point out that's a standard toxicology test, to inject a large amount, look for adverse reactions and extrapolate the danger to smaller amounts.,
That's what you'd LIKE to accuse them of doing.
But they were studying the various clotting pathways.
And you claim to be "scientific".
No, not in the slightest.
Troll.
And over your head intellectually.
But they are showing it is not.
Post YOUR work.
I misremembered that you said a billion. Then looked and saw my 2 billion estimate which I posted the work for. My reluctance to post numbers at the beginning was that they don't mean anything if there's no effect. The effects of a billion of some molecule per ml need to be measured in the tests, or some mechanism elucidatd. Your clotting mechanism was speculative and not backed up with any sources. Just numbers (spike protein numbers comparable to platelet numbers) and nothing else
That's what you'd LIKE to accuse them of doing.
But they were studying the various clotting pathways.
Which means they were also studying whether clotting took place or not.