E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “You didn’t answer my question. Why would we need a lockdown, masks and forced vaccinations?”
Beats me too. I never claimed we needed lockdowns, masks, or forced vaccinations. I have argued that these measures are a matter of state laws and are not prohibited by the US Constitution. That isn’t the same thing as supporting those measures.
E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “There was absolutely no reason for the lockdown or forced vaccination unless you have some other objective in mind.”
Now answer my questions:
Can you provide any idea of what these other objectives might be?
Can you explain why millions of health care professionals went along with these theories?
Same objective as the global warming hoax. Impoverishment/enslavement of the unwashed masses.
Can you explain why millions of health care professionals went along with these theories?
Can you explain why all the health care professionals who didn't go along were silenced?
Evidently you believe that because one side of the story was suppressed that side doesn't exist.
You're just the kind of useful idiot Chuck Todd finds useful.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.