I love sleazebags who can't answer direct questions.
Given that only 0.05% of the global population died from it and they were mainly extremely old and infirm, why would we need a lockdown, masks and forced vaccinations?
I am waiting for your answer, but I know you'll just engage in a personal attack instead because it's all you have.
E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “You didn’t answer my question. Why would we need a lockdown, masks and forced vaccinations?”
Beats me too. I never claimed we needed lockdowns, masks, or forced vaccinations. I have argued that these measures are a matter of state laws and are not prohibited by the US Constitution. That isn’t the same thing as supporting those measures.
E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “There was absolutely no reason for the lockdown or forced vaccination unless you have some other objective in mind.”
Now answer my questions:
Can you provide any idea of what these other objectives might be?
Can you explain why millions of health care professionals went along with these theories?