VAERS BOMBSHELL: Latest update shows huge DEATH anomaly. Share with every sheeple you know! [9 minute Bitchute video]

bitchute.com ^ | June 5, 2021 | WelcomeTheEagle88

[ransomnote]

ransomnote: WelcomeTheEagle88 is a highly qualified medical data analyst who has been tracking the data for Covid 19 'vaccines'  as the CDC publishes some of the records it has received every Friday.

At the end of January, his earlier videos showed 36 million doses of the Covid 'vaccines' had been administered. At that point in time, VAERS had published reports of 336 deaths following vaccination. There was, at the time, concern what this might mean in relation to product safety.

As of June 4, with the continued uploading of more old records from December and January, we now know that there were actually over 2000 reports of deaths to VAERS at the end of January, not just the originally reported 336.

Note: 750 of these deaths newly published records were designated "foreign" which would not be territories (Guam) but are more likely military or other overseas personnel.

The following is the description of the video provided by WelcomeTheEagle88: "The great majority of newly published ~750+ Deaths are coming from jabs in January or older! This revelation should change everything! Bottom line VAERS has now published 2000+ deaths January or older generated from the first 36 million doses only! Sheeple please wake up, that's 2K deaths for 36M doses so far!"

[ransomnote: How is anyone able to monitor Covid 'vaccine' safety while the CDC selectively decides which reports to publish, delete or delay? The CDC just released a video extolling the safety of the 'vaccines,' assuring the public that "...these vaccines have undergone the most intensive safety monitoring in U.S. history." In reality, we're witnessing the first time an experimental vaccine has been administered world-wide in high-pressure, incentivized campaigns while the 'products' are still in Phase III trials!]

This latest Bitchute video by WelcomeTheEagle provides a brief overview and is 8 minutes in length. In the graph below, my cursor is shown positioned over the vertical line indicating his data cutoff point (Jan 31) at which 36 million doses had been administered, and 2000 deaths are reported for that time period.

So about 40% of all reports of deaths the CDC elected to publish to date occurred during the first 12% (36 million doses), of a total of 299 million doses administered as of 6/4/2021.

VAERS BOMBSHELL: Latest update shows huge DEATH anomaly. Share with every sheeple you know! (bitchute.com)

There are continuing indications the CDC is selectively withholding reports of serious impacts (strokes, heart attacks, deaths etc.). 

Maintaining reports months behind schedule, selectively deleting or delaying reports, throttling back the flow of published reports to a trickle or mostly reporting old vaccination data from months go is proof the CDC, by choice, is not doing its job.

The projections and estimates are devastating. The CDC must release records, share with the public its early list of potential side-effects, halt the incentives (money, donuts, tickets) and provide genuine risk benefit analysis. The administration of these toxic, useless, needless 'shots' must stop.

[grey_whiskers]

More people have died from the jab than in mass shootings by assault rifles.

Or from being mis-pronouned.

[roving]

Why do vaxxers always ignore the FACT they counted all deaths as covid if they “tested” positive? Nowhere near the people they claimed died of covid actually died from it.

[grey_whiskers]

You’re guessing.
But take the jab “Because SCIENCE!”™

[grey_whiskers]

You think that’s high?

No, I think pro-jab trolls are high.

[Panzerfaust]

Danny, you are calculating a mortality rate across all age groups and co-morbidites. That’s fine if you were predicting mortality rate for falling off a 100-story skyscraper, where gravity acts on all bodies equally. Covid most assuredly does not act on all bodies equally.

In my home county, 80% of Covid deaths occurred in nursing homes. i am not in a nursing home, QED, my mortality risk is 80% lower. I am also not obese, not a smoker and have excellent overall health. My risk is minimal. I won’t get the vaccine because currently there is immunity from liability for all parties involved. I’ll get it only if required to do so by my employer, such that if I have an adverse reaction, my employer is liable.

[grey_whiskers]

You're wrong.

Because the distribution of deaths varies tremendously by age.

According to the Harvard Med School MD who was advising the CDC on the jabs (till he got thrown off the committee for wanting to *continue* the JNJ jabs!)...

The risk of people under 20 dying from the coof is 1/3000 that of a person over 70.

People over 70 have a 5% risk of death from coof (and that with comorbidites like obesity / diabetes)...

So the risk of an under-20-year-old is 5/3000 = 1/60% of 1%, or one in every 6000 people infected.

This same doctor said nobody under 70 should get the jab, due to the combination of

a) higher risk of clotting complications from the jab
b) lower risk of dying from coof.

[rolling_stone]

hmm so ivermectin is very effectve..another news blackout obliterated 97% of Delhi cases..

https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=user-share&fbclid=IwAR1DVnGi_ti_julydbvNVsMITdar9KVaKJUH51jp1QKceQWAnLoYU3nUtu0

[grey_whiskers]

Not that we’ll ever know short of autopsies being done on every last person who died SOMETIME after receiving the vaccine..

Top Kek, troll.

No similar caution about misusing PCR to diagnose people with COOF (despite the Nobel-Prize-winning inventor of PCR saying it shouldn't be used for diagnosis in the first place)

and using an absurdly inflated number of cycles of 44 to diagnose people with coof while Trump was President

and assigning cause of death to BE Covid, even down to motorcycle crashes by people who had tested positive for it.

Keep right on trolling.

[rightwingcrazy]

“you are literally 300X+ more (accounting for > 2K and < 5K current VAERS records with reported death) likely to die if you contract COVID than if you get the vaccine.”

I’m assuming you’re comparing the total number of reported Covid-related deaths over the past 18 months with the number of vaccine-related deaths over a much shorter period of time? I think a better apples-to-apples comparison would have to account for more than just that. It certainly would have to account for the remaining unknowns about the available vaccines, among other things.

For me, the data on the long-term effects of the vaccines are just not there yet, and there are plausible mechanisms for them to cause long terms problems. Considering how low the odds are that I’ll get seriously ill from Covid over the next few months, I think a wait-and-see attitude is a rational one.

[grey_whiskers]

Ah, yes, Polio.

Where they distributed a batch of "weakened virus" vaccine that ... wasn't.

But that's OK "Because SCIENCE!"™

[Lakewood]

No dog in this hunt but 1/18,000 is 0.0055556% not 0.05555%.

[HossB86]

The voyage of Christopher Columbus was a science experiment. The launch of Apollo 11's Saturn V rocket to the moon was a science experiment. Funny thing. Both experiments worked!

False Analogy

Sailing was well known and practiced for a thousand years or more, so Columbus' voyage was not a "science experiment."

Apollo 11's Saturn V rocket to the moon was the result of decades of research and experimentation. Plus, Apollo 8 and Apollo 10 had flown to the moon previously. They worked too.

But Apollo 13 didn't.

The "vaccines" aren't vaccines; they're supposed to mitigate the symptoms and length of illness. Vaccines prevent illness.

The "vaccines" ARE and experiment.

Hoss

[jonrick46]

I would have picked all the cherries and you would have, because of your bias, thought I was throwing them at you.

[ransomnote]

300,000,000 vaccinations, vs how many for the other vaccines?

You have to normalize the numbers so they are comparable. If you have 200 deaths from Covid shots—you need to compare deaths per shot for other vaccines.

I just said that 80% of ALL reports of deaths following vaccination in VAERS belong to Covid-19 vaccines. That includes ALL annual flu vaccinations which are (sadly) given to children as well as adults. Decades of flu vaccinations, in addition to all mandatory vaccinations given to children every school year.

You think 30 years of other vaccines, which account for 20% of the reports of deaths in VAERS is an inferior comparison to 6 months of Covid-19 'vaccinations, which are responsible for 80% of reported deaths?

2 years of flu vaccinations exceed the total number of Covid 19 'vaccinations' given.  

None of these charts do that.

These reports are dealing with some really big numbers. That’s the point a lot of people miss.

Nobody missed it. You are flat out denying reality.

Compared to the roll out of the polio vaccine…Covid is practically “sparkling clean.”

Do we really have to go back to the 1930's when we didn't know how to make vaccines to get a 'fair comparison'?
Polio Vaccine History: Timeline of Poliomyelitis Discovery and Vaccine Invention (flo.health)

 

[jonrick46]

The nay-sayers in Columbus’s day were saying that the voyage would take them off the edge of he earth or get them swallowed up by monsterous sea animals. Scurvy was a common result of long days at sea, which this mission required and men little understood. Yes, the three ships on this voyage were an experiment to prove the theory that it could be done. It is called human progress.

[HossB86]

The nay-sayers in Columbus’s day were saying that the voyage would take them off the edge of he earth or get them swallowed up by monsterous sea animals. Scurvy was a common result of long days at sea, which this mission required and men little understood. Yes, the three ships on this voyage were an experiment to prove the theory that it could be done. It is called human progress.

Your example is still a false analogy.

Hoss

[Vermont Lt]

X deaths / vaccinations = Deaths per vaccine.

On your charts, where does it indicate that?

Have you ever done comparative analysis? Apples to apples stuff? Because none of your stats are taking the volume of vaccinations into consideration.

You are looking at raw numbers. You cannot make comparisons without standardization or normalizing the stats. Well, you can…but it would be incorrect.

[jonrick46]

The polio vaccine rolled out with a major failure in its production. There was the way formaldehyde was used to kill the live virus that went south. Live polio virus were put into the first vaccine causing 40 000 cases of polio, leaving 200 children with varying degrees of paralysis and killing 10. Imagine if Moderna had the equivalant of the Cutter incident with their mRNA vaccine. I bet these Antivaxxers would have the guillotines set up at Moderna’s headquarters and all vaccines in the United States dumped into the Mississippi.

[DuncanWaring]

How about the science experiment known as “Apollo 1”?

[ransomnote]

Because none of your stats are taking the volume of vaccinations into consideration.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pull your fingers out of your ears and stop chanting “LA LA LA LA I CAN’T HEAR YOU!”

VAERS contains decades of flu and mandatory childhood vaccinations. ALL OTHER RECORDS in 30 years of vaccination history only account for 1/4 of Covid-19 deaths. This is not advanced math - you can understand this if you stop pretending you don’t.

6 months of Covid-19 vaccinations is roughly 300 million doses.
2 years of Flu vaccinations is roughly 340 million doses.

The disparity is by orders of magnitude worse for Covid ‘vaccines’. You do not need specific charts to grasp this information.

It’s not like the truth doesn’t exist until it’s provided to you in a chart of your choosing.