Skip to comments.
China's 'artificial sun' nuclear fusion reactor sets a new world record after running at 216MILLION°F for 100 seconds - as the nation inches closer to its goal of 'limitless clean power'
The Daily Mail uK ^
| 03 Jun 2021
| Sam Tonkin
Posted on 06/03/2021 12:20:13 AM PDT by blueplum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
what could possibly go wrong?
1
posted on
06/03/2021 12:20:13 AM PDT
by
blueplum
To: blueplum
They should try cold fusion instead! much easier!
2
posted on
06/03/2021 12:24:35 AM PDT
by
cartan
To: blueplum
1. I assume this was doin in a vacuum so the question is how do you extract the energy?
2. How large was this reaction? Usually in this type of experiments we are talking very small amounts, nanograms or less.
3
posted on
06/03/2021 12:26:58 AM PDT
by
LukeL
To: blueplum
Riefenstahl and Goebbels would be proud of news like this.
CC
4
posted on
06/03/2021 12:27:04 AM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
To: blueplum
216 million degrees? F or C?
Either way, not nearly as hot as Melania Trump.
5
posted on
06/03/2021 12:28:09 AM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: blueplum
News from the most trustworthy government in the history of the world! China is going to save us all! Hail our slave masters in China! /s
6
posted on
06/03/2021 12:29:24 AM PDT
by
fireman15
To: blueplum
And Sleepy 46 stops the drilling.
7
posted on
06/03/2021 12:31:07 AM PDT
by
Veggie Todd
(Religion. It's like a History class. Without the facts. )
To: grey_whiskers
So they are saying a nuclear fission reactor will resolve the search for 'limitless clean power'? Not solar or wind? Fancy that.
8
posted on
06/03/2021 12:32:46 AM PDT
by
Robwin
( )
To: blueplum
It also needs a certain density before you can break even . They might get it to work but practical power from fusion seems to be one of those things that is perpetually always 20 years away.
At least Gravity waves have finally been detected. It used to have the same reputation.
9
posted on
06/03/2021 12:39:28 AM PDT
by
Nateman
(If the Left Is not screaming , you are doing it wrong.)
To: blueplum
From the folks who brought you Covid.
To: LukeL
1. I assume this was doin in a vacuum so the question is how do you extract the energy? 2. How large was this reaction? Usually in this type of experiments we are talking very small amounts, nanograms or less.The fusion took place in a near vacuum. But to a physicist, vacuums are relative. To a physicist, it isn't important whether the fusion took place at 1 Pascal, or 1 micro-Pascal. To a physicist, it isn't important whether it would - in practical terms - be easy or difficult to actually harvest that energy. He is elated that he succeeded in attaining controlled fusion. That is all that matters to him.
Yes, I suppose that only nanograms of matter were actually fused - though that would still yield / release a considerable amount of energy (which might even - if practically harvestable - be approx. equal to the amount needed to run the set-up, meaning that it would then be self-sustaining).
Regards,
11
posted on
06/03/2021 12:44:03 AM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: Robwin
So they are saying a nuclear fission reactor will resolve the search for 'limitless clean power'? Not solar or wind? Fancy that. The article is about fusion, not fission.
Fusion, like what powers the Sun.
Regards,
12
posted on
06/03/2021 12:45:54 AM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: blueplum
That’s almost as hot as Algore said the earth is.
13
posted on
06/03/2021 12:49:59 AM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Caveat Emperor: Comitii asinorum atque rhinocerorum delendi sunt.)
To: All
Oh great, the world’s worst environmental polluter fooling around with technology that creates solar heat on the earth. What could possibly go wrong?
14
posted on
06/03/2021 12:52:16 AM PDT
by
Peter ODonnell
(Pray for health, economic recovery, and justice.)
To: blueplum
Maybe they’ll screw up fry themselves.
100%
To: blueplum
Yes, but can it be used to illuminate a lightbulb? How about 2 lightbulbs?
16
posted on
06/03/2021 1:08:26 AM PDT
by
jroehl
To: Robwin
Fusion (hydrogen to helium) not fusion (splitting thorium, uranium, or plutonium).
17
posted on
06/03/2021 1:14:40 AM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: blueplum
From the article:
Taylor Wilson found widespread fame when he built his own nuclear reactor aged 14 in 2008.
The machine was capable of smashing atoms in a plasma core at over 500 million degrees Fahrenheit—40 times hotter than the core of the sun—in his parents' garage..
and:
Before the successes of these geniuses was David Hahn, known as the 'Radioactive Boy Scout’.
He built a nuclear reactor in his potting shed and shut down a neighbourhood of 40,000 in 1996..
To: blueplum
Let’s see if they get massive solar flares like the Nic Cage flick “Knowing.”
To: kaehurowing
Good one. Don’t forget Fauci.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson