Posted on 05/29/2021 8:19:05 AM PDT by Cathi
Alex talks with Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph about new peer-reviewed studies that suggests there may be terrifying reasons side effects such as heart inflammation, VITT, and other serious issues may occur in those who have been vaccinated.
(Excerpt) Read more at omny.fm ...
Like The Lancet????
You know, the same Lancet that posted a fraudulent article and had to retract it?
I was more focused on the plug and play technique science was pursuing (and looks like they haven't given up on yet) that bypasses the immune system.
Just knowing plug and play bypasses the immune system should make earthlings turn and run away from this crap.
I’s sue. My Doctor will not sign off for me to get the shot.
(of course, most doctors won’t due to possible libel - but we won’t tell them that).
[giggle]
Actually the federal lien is not exactly that an employer can legally require an employee to get the Covid-19 vaccine. The actual federal analysis was there is not a FEDERAL law that prevents/prohibits that.
However, there might be state laws to consider and no doubt the employers attempts to mandate the vaccines will likely get some court challenges.
In those court challenges, I think the challengers will U.S. vaccine history and science on their side.
An employer would be required to defend a vaccine mandate. They would need to use some science for that defense. You cannot do that without putting into question why the employers do not, and never did, make getting a seasonal flu vaccine mandatory. All anyone has to do for the science is to look at the demographic and fatality rate data for the seasonal flu and Covid-19, and what is expected with Covid-19 at this point, and understand that there is no defense of Covid-19 vaccine mandates, given that there never has been for the seasonal flu. If the latter has never been required there is no reasonable defense of the former.
ALL legitimate scientific journals have retractions—some due to fraud, but most due to error. It’s a “self-correcting system”!
The bad part is the editorials in leading scientific journals that say how good it is that biden was elected, instead of the “anti-science” Trump! This is despite biden’s obvious dementia, and Trump’s sponsorship of “Warp Speed”!!
The leading journals also have lots of garbage about “diversity, inclusion, and equity”! And they NEVER publish articles or letters that contradict their leftist garbage!!! People are probably too afraid to send in any anyway!!!! (”Watch what you say!”)
The mRNA vaccines get our cells to manufacture viral proteins, using the synthetic mRNA the same way they use natural mRNA. But the vaccines do NOT bypass the immune system! The immune system recognizes the foreign proteins and produces T-cells and antibodies to them.
Like the one I linked to earlier
Well, if they don’t publish anything that contradicts their leftist playbook, then they are by default unreliable and “peer reviewed” is meaningless.
It merely becomes a synonym for “kowtows to the party line” instead of “displays integrity in its use of the scientific method and reports honestly on the results.”
Their research reports ARE peer reviewed, and are scientifically valid!
Their editorials and social commentary are NOT peer reviewed. And they publish an increasing amount of “social science”, that does NOT belong in scientific journals!!!!
It takes a knowledgeable person (with at least a bachelor’s degree in science from a good college or university) to dismiss the social-policy garbage and to concentrate on the real science and medicine.
The best approach is to refuse to read the leftist clap-trap and to concentrate on the science. I also tend to ignore most of the covid articles for lack of interest. But I may be wrong for doing so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.