Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK; Homer_J_Simpson; colorado tanker

During the war, the government paid between $20 and $25 for Springfield and Enfield pattern rifle muskets. These were the primary weapons of the infantry. The Sharps was a carbine and unsuitable for infantry due to it’s short range. Late in the war, infantrymen would buy the Henry repeating rifles and the Army would provide the ammunition. In 1864 a few regiments were re-equipped with Spencer 7 shot repeating rifles. When looking to keep 800,000 men armed, a few dollars price difference adds up quickly.


21 posted on 05/27/2021 3:10:00 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe
"When looking to keep 800,000 men armed, a few dollars price difference adds up quickly."

Sure, but if repeating rifles could give a regiment the fire-power of a brigade, a brigade the power of a division...?
Seems like somebody would want to do the math?

Somewhere I read that Lincoln himself was interested in better weapons, and that Jefferson Davis' personal security guards were armed with Sharp's rifles, and yet somehow the ideas never went much further...

25 posted on 05/27/2021 5:53:32 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson