https://i.imgur.com/GTxDBxg.png
Posted on 05/23/2021 2:47:25 PM PDT by absalom01
The New York Times said on March 17, 2020, under the headline “Hundreds of Scientists Scramble to Find a Coronavirus Treatment.” It was day seven of the pandemic, when the global death toll was 7,138. “When people get infected,” the Times said, “the best that doctors can offer is supportive care—" ... The global death toll was more than 3.3 million as this story went to press, ... The NIH and WHO are still recommending Tylenol and water in 2021. ...
Even with the rollout of vaccines, they are “not the whole answer,” Dr. Francis Collins, director of the NIH, said recently on 60 Minutes, with variants that threaten to defeat vaccines ... (and the) majority of poor 7.9 billion humans who won’t get a big pharma jab any time soon. ... “People are going to continue to get sick,” Collins said. “We need treatments for those people.”
...
Kory expressed disgust with “the physician-scientists in the ivory towers and public health agencies” who are “just not getting it;” it was up to doctors now to save lives as the scientists are “completely disconnected to how to treat this disease and what to do.” His mentor takes the longer view. “The saddest thing for us is we know this can make a difference and save lives,” Marik says, “and it seems like nobody really cares and wants to listen to us.” But “we feel we can’t be silenced, we just can’t be, because you know the truth will ultimately prevail.”
“This is how science always progresses,” says Dr. Berkowitz, who takes hope from the recovery of Judy Smentkiewicz. “This is what being a doctor is,” he said. “It says in the Talmud, if you save one life, you save the entire world.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mountainhomemag.com ...
Wall of words to get to the point
Ivermectin works
And
Trump took it, apparently secretly
“In addition, Kory, Marik, et. al published the first comprehensive COVID-19 prevention and early treatment protocol (which they would eventually call I-MASK). It is centered around the drug Ivermectin, which President Trump used at Walter Reed hospital, unreported by the press, though it may well have saved the president’s life while he was instead touting new big pharma drugs.”
Ping
https://i.imgur.com/GTxDBxg.png
I think I would opt for the doxycycline over azythromycin. Doxycycline can pass the blood brain barrier.
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 56 studies
Covid Analysis, Nov 26, 2020 (Version 83, May 18, 2021 — Merck analysis)
https://ivmmeta.com/
The apple version would be iVermectin
That’s one of the big stories of the past year, that this piece helps contextualize.
Granted, it was a big year. Silicon valley and the legacy media finally decided that censorship was the way to go, and if you don’t like it, you can just create your own internet. The Democrat machine figured out they could apply the corrupt election techniques that they had perfected in California to the rest of the country.
And then the story that this author discusses: big pharma, the hospital directors, the regulators bureaucrats and politicians decided to seize full control of the most basic medical decisions from doctors and patients.
And the American people just went along.
Wow. Where are the Vax pimps?
Do you have a link for that? All I can find is allergy relief.
Great article. Thanks for posting.
The article hits a lots of bases. Hope. Determination.
Focus on simple affordable life-saving treatment. And — US Government and Big Pharma determined to find a massively expensive solution.
Ivermectin will help millions of people in countries with less corruption.
The article hits a lots of bases. Hope. Determination.
Focus on simple affordable life-saving treatment. And — US Government and Big Pharma determined to find a massively expensive solution.
Ivermectin will help millions of people in countries with less corruption.
Having COPD, I was interested in what was "S-Protein attachment" mentioned in your post. So I searched for it. The 4th item in the list had SARS-CoV in the title. It was dated 2009. I keyed in on the CoV and the SARS part didn't register with me. So I'm going 2009??? So I opened it.
Here's the article: The spike protein of SARS-CoV — a target for vaccine and therapeutic development
READ IT! Deja Freaking Vu!!! It's all there. It reads like they are talking about WuFlu. Bats, civits, spike proteins, the images, quarantines; the whole story we've been fed for the last year and a half. THEY KNEW IT ALL. Covid-19 is nothing "novel" unless you consider it to be the new and improved SARS. The minute they saw this "new" virus THEY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT WAS GOING ON.
Then there's this little snippet:
Although the outbreaks of SARS seem to be over, SARS is still a safety concern because of the possible reintroduction of a SL-CoV into humans and the risk of an escape of SARS-CoV from laboratories. [SL being SARS-like]Gee, ya think??? And look at the two footnotes for that sentence, both from 2004. An updated version of the article could include the State Department warning about the Wuhan lad practices.
THEY HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH THIS FOR TEN YEARS.
Bookmark
They are banning NAC because it helped Covid patients. Going to make it prescription only. Just evil. Amazon already pulled it.
https://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/regulatory/amazon-confirms-plans-removing-nac-supplements
Amazon chickened out. Not sure this will be a trend among other retailers, tho.
I'll say! Finally hit the ctrl+F keys to find it.
" It is centered around the drug Ivermectin, which President Trump used at Walter Reed hospital,"
Criminal.
That’s a good word for all of this.
There’s another angle that hasn’t been fully explored, and that’s the sudden, and unprecedented, and wide-ranging involvement of regulators, politicians, journalists, and epidemiologists in what had heretofore been purely private medical decisions between physicians and patients.
It was just over a year ago that some governors (eg Nevada’s) banned the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat covid. After a year of searching, there appears to be no precedent for this. It seemed purely political at the time “Trump proposed it, so we’re against it”, but is that all there was? People died because of that, so where’s the accountability?
And now, with the evidence piling up that a range of early treatments are available, the powers that be still say that the best move is for an infected person to stay home until they need hospitalization. I don’t buy conspiracy explanations because it’s just too much work for humans to maintain a true conspiracy (someone always talks), but there is a lot more to this story than we’ve been able to uncover so far.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.