Posted on 05/21/2021 12:47:40 PM PDT by Cathi
...vaccines aimed at creating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have potential to cause microvascular injury to brain, heart, liver, kidneys ...does not appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.
...100 German patients recovered from COVID-19 revealed significant cardiac involvement on cardiac MRI scans in 78% of them, ...2-1/2 months after their recovery from acute illness. Two-thirds of these patients were never hospitalized, and there was ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60%.
...there is complement-mediated damage even in grossly normal skin of coronavirus-infected individuals.
...that ACE-2 receptor expression is highest in the microvasculature of the brain and subcutaneous fat, and to a lesser degree in the liver, kidney, and heart.
...further demonstrated the coronavirus replicates almost exclusively in the septal capillary endothelial cells of lungs and nasopharynx, and viral lysis and immune destruction of cells releases viral capsid proteins (or pseudovirions) that travel through the circulation and bind to ACE2 receptors in these other parts of the body leading to mannan-binding lectin complement pathway activation that not only damages microvascular endothelium but also induces production of many pro-inflammatory cytokines.
...the spike protein in brain endothelial cells is associated with formation of microthrombi (clots),
...do not find viral RNA in brain endothelium. In other words, viral proteins appear to cause tissue damage without actively replicating virus.
...it appears that the viral spike protein that is the target of major SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is also one of the key agents causing the damage to distant organs that may include brain, heart, lung, kidney.
...it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on these other organs.
(Excerpt) Read more at regulations.gov ...
Thankfully I didn’t get covid, as far as I know. And hopefully never will. I was at the cardiologist recently and got to look at the ultrasound of my heart. Heart looks good. Pumping at least. No inflammation.
Covid induced inflammation, or vaccine induced inflammation? Maybe ivermectin is the best choice. Early and often?
Thanks
Puntmann et al. (JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:1265-1273) showed that the prospective study of 100 German patients who were recently recovered from COVID-19 revealed significant cardiac involvement on cardiac MRI scans in 78% of them, an average 2-1/2 months after their recovery from the acute illness. Two-thirds of these patients were never hospitalized, and there was ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60%. The abnormalities occurred independent of preexisting conditions, severity of the initial disease, and overall course of the acute illness.
The wife and I had it back in October. I was lucky, knocked me down for 3 days, felt like crap for a week. A large part of my short down period is due to my concerns for my type 1 diabetic wife. It hit her hard and fast, she was down for 10 days.
She is a nurse and was working at the county testing clinic from the beginning. Her employer did not ‘force’ her to get the vax, but all employees were told that if they did not get vax’d any time off or medical bills due to the Fauci Flu (my words) would not be covered by the hospital under the employees perks. She was afraid of another infection from one of the ‘variants’ the media was always hawking so she got vaxed.
Now everyone at the clinic is reading about side effects. She’s worried Fauci Flu will give me an enlarged heart, I am worried the vax is doing worse to her - especially her kidneys and liver.
Was the vaccination mandatory?
If there is an adverse event from the vaccine, and the vaccine was mandatory, they must be filed as OSHA an recordable.
https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine
Coercion like you describe can be considered mandatory. “An employee who chooses not to receive the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from this choice. If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing adverse action, then the vaccine is not merely “recommended” and employers should consult the above FAQ regarding COVID-19 vaccines that are a condition of employment.”
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/osha-s-new-guidance-recordability-covid-19-vaccine-reactions
Related;
Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3961224/posts
Got this from another FReeper and love Dr. Peter McCullough. He explains all stages of disease and his at home multi-drug approach to prevent hospitalization.
Yeah, the point of my post was concern that either the vaccine or the virus both point to some or another form of cardiovascular inflammation. My guess is that the virus would be worse than the vaccine inducded inflammation but these days it is very difficult to get hands on information. Too much politics, too much censorship. And frankly not enough research.
I am actually getting a 4th covid test this weekend. I am confident it will be negative but who knows. I suspect that there was much greater asymptomatic spread than the stats tell us. I think the actual infection rates are more than double the official rates. Which if true you can read any way you want to - either that it spread much worse than we thought, but also that the mortality rate is much lower than we calculate. I imagine most people who were symptomatic were tested but if asymptomatic no real reason to rush out and get tested.
That’s why I really wish they would have studied treatments much more vigorously. I can’t swear to any solution but it seems to me vaccines don’t offer any significant help to those already infected and don’t stop the spread of the disease either. Just lessen the risk of severe illness. But maybe there are a combination of medicines out there, if taken early, that would do the same thing.
Sorry I used sloppy language. What I meant to say, more precisely, was that I suspect that an infection from covid is more likely to cause cardiovascular inflammation than the vaccines would. Even though they both might. But I base that only on the limited information I have seen.
Thanks. I’ll watch the video.
The point of Dr. Whelan’s warning isn’t to quantify harm from the vaccine vs. covid disease. His point is that in both cases the microvasculature damage is from the Spike protein.
Salk’s new study that claims that covid is a vascular disease rather than a respiratory one is based on the damage the Spike protein does to the vasculature in various organs.
Salk provides the evidence that Dr. Whelan was right.
Thank you for that clarification. Something to think about. I am watching the video of Dr. McCollough, link was posted above.
I see from Dr. Whelan that thrombosis, and/or inflammation of the heart (either myocarditis or pericarditis or similar) is common from the disease. I have also read that it is a risk from the vaccines so I have no reason to doubt Dr. Whelan. The question is just about the relative risk, is it riskier to get covid or riskier to get the vaccine as far as heart disease goes. I don’t think we have enough information about the vaccines and only a short time frame to look at but generally speaking, with 100+ million vaccinations, it would seem to not be as prevalent.
I have been on an ACE inhibitor for years. I’ve been taking Zinc, D, Quercetin and a handful of other supplements as well. I don’t know if Ivermectin would work as a prophylactic but there is plenty of data suggesting it helps post infection. Dr. McCollough in that video claims that there is up to a 2 week period of time between infection and symptoms, and says (in my own words) it’s a disgrace that we have not developed a protocol for that 2 week period that would prevent disease progression. So I am just deducing here that whether ivermectin is prophylactic or not, it would seem that it would help either way to reduce viral shedding and viral replication.
Are adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine recordable on the OSHA recordkeeping log?
DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
They changed that today.
Here’s what it said this morning;
“If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?
If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.”
https://web.archive.org/web/20210521074344/https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine
Was the vaccination mandatory?
If there is an adverse event from the vaccine, and the vaccine was mandatory, they must be filed as OSHA an recordable.
https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine
Coercion like you describe can be considered mandatory. “An employee who chooses not to receive the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from this choice. If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing adverse action, then the vaccine is not merely “recommended” and employers should consult the above FAQ regarding COVID-19 vaccines that are a condition of employment.”
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/osha-s-new-guidance-recordability-covid-19-vaccine-reactions
No, not mandatory as far as continued employment. One of the perks of working for the hospital is that any hospital procedure or hospital stay is free of charge. Failing to get the vaccine would result in out of pocket expenses if she had to be hospitalized due to Fauci Flu and would have to use personal/vacation time rather than paid sick leave.
Thank you for that OSHA link, I will share it with her and her co-workers. Interestingly the older ones are more leery of the shot, the young ones lined up no questions asked.
OSHA changed that rule yesterday, which is not a surprise. Here’s what it says now;
https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine
The powers the be really don’t want to talk about adverse events. The vehement way the vaccines are being promoted really makes me wonder if there’s something we aren’t being told.
DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
So they will NOT be recording adverse effects. The workers are left out to dry?
“So they will NOT be recording adverse effects. The workers are left out to dry?”
Yes. Well, the government is hanging all who suffer adverse events out to dry. The covid vaccines are under EUA so they don’t have to be covered in the VICP program.
Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries — Preventing Inequities in Compensation
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2034438
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.