Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will You Really Take The (Covid 19) Vaccine After Watching This
Bitchute ^ | 05/17/21

Posted on 05/20/2021 3:03:35 AM PDT by Enlightened1

This is a great short video that must be shared to the public.  This is pretty much the way I understand it.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gFq50Z2nrS5n/


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: chinavirusvaccine; covid19; embarrassing; experimental; fakenews; fearporn; gethelp; herewegoagain; hysterics; info; mortality; mrna; notthisagain; recycledfakenews; seekhelpnow; sideeffects; straightjacket; trash; trumpvaccine; vaccine; warpspeed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-200 next last
To: HandyDandy
Who is the stupid idiot that put the government in charge of healthcare?

Obama, Clinton, Pelosi and all the corrupt politicians who voted in obamacare.

They just took it on themselves, actually.

Who wants the same government that can't run the DMV and the post office to be in charge of our health care?

There's NOTHING that the government can't screw up once it gets it's paws on it.

81 posted on 05/20/2021 7:38:27 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: metmom; HandyDandy

There’s NOTHING that the government can’t screw up once it gets it’s paws on it.


True....and, NO aspect of YOUR healthcare THEY won’t want to control, either.

Good video. Will share.


82 posted on 05/20/2021 7:39:45 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Pollard

....considering the CDC changed the number of cycles a vaccinated person is tested for as opposed to the number of cycles an unvaccinated person is tested for, that comes as no surprise.....


How convenient that they changed the cycles (of their testing), to downplay cases.....brought on.....by their experimental shots.

Yet another loud alarm to the sheeple.


83 posted on 05/20/2021 7:42:49 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Yet another loud alarm to the sheeple.

There should be a cacophony of alarm bells and flashing lights going on all over with this unspeakable terror campaign.... yet, there doesn't seem to be much of impact across broad swaths of the population....

Seems that we've crossed the line and have more sheeple than people....

84 posted on 05/20/2021 7:50:13 AM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I already did it.


85 posted on 05/20/2021 7:53:30 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Think of it this way.

What is more important your life or your job?

The fact they threatened your job with an experimental mRNA gene therapy is an International crime, violates the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Code.
——————
My Bay Area adjunct teaching job they did. I will not be teaching with them past July.

My UK teaching position is also requiring full vaccination to teach there face-to-face

It’s either take the chance with the vaccine or be homeless and quick death due to being homeless. And also never seeing my wife and kids again due to upcoming no vaccine/no fly rules on international flights.

Could not find a single suitable job in the United States as the field I work in is dominated 99.9% by H1B and other Indians and unemployment is running out quick.


86 posted on 05/20/2021 7:54:18 AM PDT by Starcitizen (So Indian H1B crybaby trash runs Free Republic moderation??? Seems so. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: metmom

metmom wrote: “That’s a pretty generic claim. Go ahead and give us specifics.”

I gave two specifics earlier. That is sufficient to substantiate my claim of false and misleading data.


87 posted on 05/20/2021 7:59:01 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: zzeeman

The simple fact that our gov’t has withheld known good cheap and available cures is criminal. And only so that the experimental biological genome code would be the only option! We must be flucking nuts! They’ve scared the bejeebers out of us and steer us to one highly suspect solution. Is it the final solution?


88 posted on 05/20/2021 8:00:49 AM PDT by HandyDandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: metmom

metmom wrote: “It’s not misleading because the information in the video was based on what *science* was telling us at the time.”

Then it would be correct to say that the video is based upon outdated, now proven, false and misleading data?

If that’s the case then why do the anti-vaxxers keep posting such videos.


89 posted on 05/20/2021 8:00:51 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy

HandyDandy wrote: “Which vaccine did you take? .....and why?”

I took the Pfizer because it was the only vaccine available at the time in this location. I took the vaccine because I was convinced that the vaccine was far safer than relying upon Vitamin D, etc., to prevent the virus.


90 posted on 05/20/2021 8:02:21 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: metmom

metmom wrote: “Well, considering the CDC changed the number of cycles a vaccinated person is tested for as opposed to the number of cycles an unvaccinated person is tested for, that comes as no surprise.”

Pure speculation. The fact remains that the number of vaccinated are up, cases are down, illnesses are down, deaths are down. The vaccines have proven themselves to be safe and effective.


91 posted on 05/20/2021 8:04:59 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

How do we know then, that the “new” science is not more propaganda o coerce people into taking the vaccine?

Do you really trust the government that much?


92 posted on 05/20/2021 8:05:01 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Not pure speculation.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-changes-rules-counting-breakthrough-cases/

In April, the CDC issued new guidance to laboratories recommending reducing the RT-PCR CT value to 28 cycles — but only for those fully vaccinated individuals being tested for COVID.


93 posted on 05/20/2021 8:07:33 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: QuigleyDU

QuigleyDU wrote: “...a non vaccine synthetic chemical device on a trusting populace who have no idea of standard timeline and the process of making sure a drug is safe...”

Just two more false and misleading statements. These are vaccine. The standard timeline was an outmoded, over-regulated standard which we were lucky enough that Trump revolutionized the process.

Before the vaccines were available we were suffering thousands of deaths a day, yet the anti-vaxxer cult would have us forego the life saving vaccines for more testing. How many more would have died in 10 or 15 years.


94 posted on 05/20/2021 8:10:15 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: metmom

metmom wrote: “Not pure speculation.”

Anyone who uses the childrens health defense as a source is a certified anti-vaxxer.

It is speculation that the change in cycles fully accounts for the reductions in illnesses. BTW, how does the reduction in cycles account for decreases in deaths and hospitalizations.

metmom wrote: “How do we know then, that the “new” science is not more propaganda o coerce people into taking the vaccine? Do you really trust the government that much?”

How do we know that the “new” anti-vaxxer rhetoric is not more propaganda to scare people away from the life saving vaccines?

I trust the physicians I know personally far more than I do medical advice from anonymous posters on the internet. I trust peer reviewed studies published in reputable medical journals far more than I do the childrens health defense or America’s Front Line Doctors.


95 posted on 05/20/2021 8:20:13 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

QuigleyDU wrote: “...a non vaccine synthetic chemical device on a trusting populace who have no idea of standard timeline and the process of making sure a drug is safe...”

Just two more false and misleading statements. These are vaccine. The standard timeline was an outmoded, over-regulated standard which we were lucky enough that Trump revolutionized the process.

Before the vaccines were available we were suffering thousands of deaths a day, yet the anti-vaxxer cult would have us forego the life saving vaccines for more testing. How many more would have died in 10 or 15 years.


An inconvenient fact. The hospital rates and death rate numbers were crashing before enough vaccinations to make a difference, administered. Take your pro synthetic chemical medical device misinformation somewhere where real facts aren’t known.


96 posted on 05/20/2021 8:23:49 AM PDT by QuigleyDU ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Tommy Revolts

Tommy Revolts wrote: “I’m not an anti-vaxxer, but then again, this is not a vaccine. Check back in about 5 years. Good luck.”

It is a vaccine as defined by state of the art technology. Evidently some wish we were still resorting to using cowpox to protect against small pox.

BTW, I don’t need good luck since I’ve been vaccinated. Good luck to you with your Vitamin D.


97 posted on 05/20/2021 8:24:14 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

For example: the video claims the vaccines are unsafe because they haven’t been tested.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Been over this a few dozen times...The experimental gene therapies being heavily promoted by the media and biden have no long-term clinical trials...Some are not comfortable with that or the fact that there is no liability for any unforeseen effects.

Frankly, I have grown more skeptical about the vaccines as this administration and their celebrity promoters have pushed harder and harder for everyone and their children to get the vaccine, and get it ASAP...Everyone...even those who have had COVID?! It is as if they are rushing to beat a deadline...These are the same people who scream “My body, my choice!” on steps of the Supreme Court building and condemn GMO foods yet regarding the vaccine, biden says “unvaccinated will pay a price” if they don’t get the jab and they are OK with “GMOing” peoples’ bodies...This gives me pause.

Words I live by...Reagan’s famous quote: “The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”

Some here have decided to get the shot; some, to never get the jab; some are waiting...Regardless, you cannot accurately say any of the vaccines have been thoroughly tested long-term.

You are a part of the clinical trial as I am guessing you got the shot. I appreciate your willingness to trust the powers that be and get the jab. I have family who have gotten the jab, and some who have not. It is personal choice and .

Speaking of powers that be, does it feel even the slightest bit uncomfortable for you to promote something that biden, fauci, CDC, etc. are also heavily promoting?


98 posted on 05/20/2021 8:25:41 AM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“Hospitals mandate a number of vaccines. The package usually includes hepatitis B (required by OSHA)”

Minor point, but not required by OSHA. It is required to be offered, but it can be declined.

Declination Statement

I understand that due to my occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials I may be at risk of acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. I have been given the opportunity to be vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine, at no charge to me; however, I decline hepatitis B vaccination at this time. I understand that by declining this vaccine I continue to be at risk of acquiring hepatitis B, a serious disease. If, in the future I continue to have occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials and I want to be vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine, I can receive the vaccination series at no charge to me.

Employee Signature:_____________________________ Date:____________________

https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/hospital/hazards/bbp/declination.html


99 posted on 05/20/2021 8:25:57 AM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

If the gov’t hadn’t put restrictions on known good alternatives, would you still have chosen to inject yourself with an experimental biological agent?


100 posted on 05/20/2021 8:28:00 AM PDT by HandyDandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson