There you go again.
There you go again.
Nonsense. Reagan was committed to doing what was doable. He wasn’t the ideologue some take him for. Even if he hadn’t been, his advisors would have pushed him in that direction anyway. And “body double” is ridiculous. Somebody would have noticed if that was the case, and nobody did. It is true that Bush’s brother knew Hinckley’s brother. They were both in Denver’s oil business. But John Hinckley Jr was just crazy.
NOISE. Plenty of crap going on right now that needs to be addressed-like the stolen election of 2020. Topics like this provide a distraction from more immediate problems. 😲
This is like the caller to Larry King alive that said Ollie North and Reagan had anal sex in the Oval Office daily.
“This seemed to suggest a body double. “
Someone has seen the movie “Dave” too many times. :D
Mention the possibility of a stolen 2020 Election, and suddenly you’re a conspiracy theorist, or just crazy. This kind of neo McCarthyism is standard operating procedure for the leftist media.
This is their way of preventing evidence from discovery, and influence. I would hate to see this happen on FR. The correct question to ask is “What is the evidence?” If it is thin or none, then so be it.
Reagan was shot in 1981.
He died in 2004.
How could anyone be dumb enough to believe that Nancy Reagan would live with a double for 23 years and not know, or if she knew, allow it to be kept secret?
She was the most devoted wife and protector any of us have ever seen.
FR has suddenly become infested with idiot. Either that or trolls and bots representing the interests of swamp monsters.
Jim is a great guy for not falling into the trap of becoming a carbon copy of Jack Dorsey or Zuckerberg.
I guess he is counting, properly, on ridicule to keep things on an even keel.
Now I do confess that the treachery we se exposed almost daily makes me wonder about some of the past events, but Hinkley was clearly insane. Could someone have prodded him to attempt killing Reagan? Possibly, considering what we have learned since 2016.
But Reagan was still Reagan.
Dunno about that, but GWB didn’t remember where he was when JFK was shot.
Sorry, but this is a particularly dumb theory regarding some admittedly suspicious coincidences. A permanent “body double” that is good enough to fool the thousands of people that come into contact with the President is still the stuff of sci-fi even today.
If GHWB or someone else did try to have Reagan offed, the only reasonable idea is that the attempt failed. And assuming for the sake of argument that the motivation was what this person suggests, Reagan’s “change of heart” would have been due to the message having been received.
And, when Nixon was going through his trouble, it was GHWB who told Nixon that "they" would no longer be able to help him intimating that he needed to resign. Afterwards Nixon told a close friend that he did not want happening to him what happened to JFK.
Then, isn't it tremendously curious that the guy who shot Reagan was not an acquaintance but the son of close personal friends to the Bush family, where the death of Reagan would mean the immediate ascendance of GHWB to the presidency.
It is just real, real curious.
Why not? He killed Kennedy.
What's another President between friends.
I swear to God, FR gets more and more retarded, nonsensical posts every day...
Of course GHWB was involved in it. But no way on the body double. Occam’s razor. Who gains the most? Who was connected to those involved? Who has been involved in such shenanigans in the past? To think that a family friend being involved was just random noise is sheer stupidity.
All these posters I’ve never seen before being derisive have me thinking you could be onto something.
For the record, I’ve seen the domestic surveillance machine, so I know anything is possible.
If Reagan had been killed, why wouldn’t Bush have simply assumed the presidency and pretended to be sad about it?
This really is nonsense.
I lime to put candy sprinkles on my tin foil hat for the birds to munch. The glitter is so I look sparkly!
Whether Hinckley did in fact take out Reagan?
No. Hinckley did not kill Reagan, since Mr. Reagan worked for twelve years in an office on Wilshire Blvd. in Los Angeles after his presidency.
Every patriot who feels discouraged should visit the Reagan Museum in Simi Valley, since every patriot will learn how the Lord used Reagan to bring peace to America and the world. Plus, the gifts that Reagan received from patriotic Americans are wonderful: saddles, boots, quilts, paintings, etc.
No, I think Reagan’s mannerisms, looks, and voice were impossible to duplicate.
However, I do believe that Bush INTENDED that Hinkley take out Reagan.