Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: absalom01
...because if it *is* a bioweapon, allowing the final word to be "well, it was just a little lab oopsie, nothing to see here" is a monumentally low-percentage move: not for rhetoric, but for the long-term survival of the country.

(that is how I read your "...though that does not necessarily mean that it escaped from a lab, or even that it was “engineered” or the product of “gain of function” research." from this post.)

It's a fine line. Because people jump to two conclusions about the coof being a bioweapon.

1) The perfection argument -- this was also used to try to argue against it being engineered ("look! molecular modeling shows the spike protein isn't the tightest possible binding configuration to the human receptors! It *can't* have been manmande"). This argument goes, "If it were a bioweapon, it would have killed tens of millions in the US, or more. Since it didn't it must be natural!"

That's not necessarily true; people jump to that conclusion from watching too many James Bond movies. US policy has been for a long time, to consider that type of thing a "weapon of mass destruction" and to respond with nukes.

But a lower-level virus that just gums up our economy and makes politicians chase their tails -- and allows mail-in ballots and voter fraud -- that's not so clear-cut.

2) If it's a bioweapon, it must have been intended to be released in this form.

That doesn't necessarily follow. It might be the Chinese were still investigating, and the famous Chinese quality control happened, and a less-lethal, early version still being played with, got loose.

The reason it's so important to the survival of the country is this.

Our government, (remember the $1.5 billion deal with Hunter Biden before the election, solely because of "who he knew"?; remember DiFi's driver being a Chicom spy; remember Eric Shartswell on the House Intelligence Committee doing the BangBang with Fang Fang), and our Universities, and many businesses, are infested with Chicom spies.

China likely has visibility to US responses while we're still developing the response.

As far as my posting history, you pointedly didn't look for scientific links, even though that's what you originally said you wanted, and what I invited you to look for.

49 posted on 05/15/2021 4:16:07 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

Thank you.

It appears to me that we have very small points of disagreement. For what it’s worth, my personal opinion is that this was most likely manipulated in a lab (and there is no such thing as purely civilian work in China), and escaped from a lab. I just don’t find the evidence in the public domain to date to be sufficient to convince a fair minded skeptic, but I can see that others may disagree.

I remain of the opinion that the CCP’s demonstrated strategy of containing the contagion internally, while doing everything in its power to see that it infected the rest of the word is a crime of historic proportion in and of itself. If the Democrat party (aided in part by the CCP) had not succeeded in stealing the election, I have no doubt that Trump would have addressed this aggression with some sort of national-security level response. Not necessarily military, but a strong response nonetheless.


55 posted on 05/15/2021 9:04:08 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson