Thank you.
It appears to me that we have very small points of disagreement. For what it’s worth, my personal opinion is that this was most likely manipulated in a lab (and there is no such thing as purely civilian work in China), and escaped from a lab. I just don’t find the evidence in the public domain to date to be sufficient to convince a fair minded skeptic, but I can see that others may disagree.
I remain of the opinion that the CCP’s demonstrated strategy of containing the contagion internally, while doing everything in its power to see that it infected the rest of the word is a crime of historic proportion in and of itself. If the Democrat party (aided in part by the CCP) had not succeeded in stealing the election, I have no doubt that Trump would have addressed this aggression with some sort of national-security level response. Not necessarily military, but a strong response nonetheless.
Researchers at Wuhan isolated and sequenced a very fatal bat coronavirus (from a mine, miners dying in 2012, seqeuncing of virus in 2013) and ...hmmm, covered their tracks.
The researchers working on the virus told Scientific American in 2020, the miners died of a fungus.
Why not say the miners died of something with the same symptoms as the coof? That would've been a perfect "natural origin" cover story right there.
The article says:
"These examples of unpublished viruses may only be the tip of an iceberg. What they and the examples that preceded it highlight, however, is the importance of accessing the WIV’s virus databases that were taken offline at the outset of the pandemic. These are where unpublished viral sequences from the WIV and elsewhere were stored. The need to know which viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2 were being studied by scientists in Wuhan in 2019 is urgent."