Posted on 05/14/2021 5:34:20 PM PDT by Cathi
Previously, states reported all cases of breakthrough infection, regardless of severity, to the CDC. States will continue to report all positive cases of Covid-19 to the CDC — including any mild or asymptomatic breakthrough cases — but the agency will not differentiate between mild or symptom-free cases in vaccinated versus unvaccinated people.
It is unclear if states will continue to collect mild or asymptomatic breakthrough case data.
The CDC spokesperson told CNN that the change in breakthrough case reporting would not affect the understanding of vaccine efficacy.
“CDC is still doing studies on mild breakthrough infections, so people should not be worried that we are going to miss important data related to mild vaccine breakthrough infections,” the spokesperson said.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
I assume you realize that data from a drug trial is almost always more favorable than the in the field data and that is why actual in the field data is so important. All trial participants are carefully “selected” by the trial sponsor.
But, we did get the six month follow up of the Moderna Cove 3 trial. In the original trial they reported that 11 of the vaccinated group got covid and stated 94.5% efficacy which again was based on the fact that very few people in either group, vax or control, contracted covid.
“Moderna’s latest analysis of its vaccine clinical trial data shows 900 people got COVID-19 after being vaccinated, consistent with 90% or more efficacy for the vaccine, company spokesperson Colleen Hussey said.”
“The company shared an update on the Phase 3 COVE study of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. An updated review of adjudicated cases has identified over 900 cases of COVID-19 in the COVE study as of April 9th, including over 100 cases of severe COVID-19, as defined in the protocol, with a median follow-up of approximately 6 months post dose 2, it said.”
The following is a great explanation of what the vaccine manufacturer’s data really mean.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Ue85EV2Us
On the local FB Community forums their is a “Republican for Biden” nurse who can and will spend hours defending whatever decision the Dem. Gov has made, telling everyone she is a hero nurse, and she understands the science.
She defended this change with the same CDC talking point of we want to make sure we had good data, etc. Well, if you want good data track ALL break-thru cases and also include the subset of those that required hospitalization, etc.
How can they have any success promoting the coming booster shots if they don’t hide the bad data on the vaccines? You have to think like a crook to keep up with them.
So true!
It also helps the government ignore that the percentage of vaxxed infected matches the unvvaxxed percentage. JMO, but I’d make a bet.
Exactly what they did when bammy was in office. Just stop counting and it all goes away.
Bingo.
Even though they will miss important data related to mild vaccine breakthrough infections, not to worry?
EXACTLY!!!!! In meantime restricting movement of those unvaccinated AND their ability to make a living AND promoting spread of virus by un-masked vaccinated people and all designed to blame, threaten (literally as well due to increasing potential spread), and coerce, the unvaccinated into complying by making life impossible for them
In the short three weeks that they reported “breakthrough cases” the numbers were increasing rapidly which I’m sure is why they stopped reporting them. Example: California reported 1,379 “breakthrough cases” on May 3rd. Ten days later (May 13) they reported 3,600+
As we can see from the 8 vaccinated New York Yankees (out of a 50 person “traveling party”) who contracted covid the CDC’s repeated claim that such cases are RARE was untrue.
And as far as their assurance that they are still doing studies on mild breakthrough infections....they still haven’t been able to find causation for any of the 4,434 “after vax deaths” so I wouldn’t hold my breath...:-)
Cooking the numbers...
Well stated.
As they have ending tracking asymptomatic cases and ended the mask mandate for the vaccinated, it seems like a switch has been flipped. Many states jumping to end their mandates. So my question is, who or what has given that order to the CDC?
As they have ending tracking asymptomatic cases and ended the mask mandate for the vaccinated, it seems like a switch has been flipped. Many states jumping to end their mandates. So my question is, who or what has given that order to the CDC?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
#METOO
I’ve been wondering if friend or FOE directed those changes, and as I always try to remind myself, it could be a combination of those.
One of the critical problems (risks) with the Covid ‘vaccines’ is ADE (immune enhancement - makes you more severely ill than you would otherwise become by sensitizing
you - your immune system then ‘overheats.’
In animal trials for mRNA technology in 2005 and 2012, vaccinating the trial animals (cats) caused them to produce the desired antibodies (100%) success. But when later exposed to the virus, all sickened and died.
They trialed vaccinated mice and sacrificed them (killed and examined their lungs) after exposure to the virus and found disease.
This technology never made it out of animal trials until Covid-19, and there is no known body of work that shows they overcame the problem/risk of ADE.
By now ruling that they will not track mild/asymptomatic Covid, they protect themselves a few ways.
They know their ‘efficacy rate’ is not really 95% and if they were tracking mild/asymptomatic illness, this would become obvious.
They know their PCR test is not valid, does not detect the Covid-19 virus. By eliminating this mild/asymptomatic illness tracking they help continue the sham of using it.
But I think the main ‘protection’ they gain is that by not tracking mild illness, they will hide a portion of the young people who will now have symptoms of Covid. The young among the unvaccinated rarely get Covid unless immunocompromised.
With vaccination and its risk of ADE, the young will otherwise have Covid in greater numbers. Initially, less severe because their immune systems are stronger than the older folks, but they will have Covid in numbers greater than the non-vaccinated group as a result of ADE.
Among the older people, the vaccinated are at risk of having Covid-19 in greater numbers than they ‘should’ but their illnesses will likely be excused by ‘stronger variants’ and older age making them ‘more vulnerable than we realized’ or some such farce.
I think the mask mandate lift is because their attempts to force vaccination are meeting with resistance so they are going to turn it over to the public to further harass those wearing masks - tell them to get the vaccine and stop ‘killing us all.’
Think of high density ‘Karen’ zones and being the only person wearing a mask in the local organic produce store. The hatred they will turn on those people.
Or ‘random’ attacks on the masked, false flags committed by masked. Since conservatives are more resistant to vaccination, it helps put a MAGA target on everyone wearing a mask.
I don’t know if this will work though because they’ve terrorized more liberals than conservatives.
If these are white hat objectives that I have mistaken for black hat objectives, then both steps are a move toward opening up our nation. It’s possible both sides want this for their own reasons.
On May 5, the CDC published to their website data they would rather hide showing that of all the 500+K deaths they have attributed to Covid, only 5% are from ‘Covid only” and the other 95% of deaths averaged 4 comorbidities. So I wonder - who made them publish that? They are lying everywhere else but some key data - like actual death rate.
SO maybe both sides are jostling each other over reports and measures.
Just a hunch - I think the DS is desparate and made changes to try to make inroads. They risk little and can make up new lies in an hour and reverse everything they just said - they do it all the time. :/
The very same CDC that stopped documenting H1N1 cases during that pandemic to protect Obama. Remember this???
“In late July, the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases. The rationale given for the CDC guidance to forego testing and tracking individual cases was: why waste resources testing for H1N1 flu when the government has already confirmed there’s an epidemic?”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/swine-flu-cases-overestimated/
All along NYS has been counting pobables and repeat positives of the same patient as new cases.
This is just SSDD.
I will use my anecdotal information on my self long before trusting these hacks to force a dubious antidotal solution on me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.